Tucker Carlson Obsession Thread (merged)

#1,452
#1,452
BreatheUT said:
D@mn FoxNews has some fine women. Nicole Saphier. They lose some eye and intelligence talent and they have more waiting in the stables.

Meanwhile, cnn and msnbc has baskets of crows.
Click to expand...

I've never considered attractiveness as a measure of integrity. If the fact that the anchors are hot is influencing your choice of information sources, you should probably reflect on that.
 
#1,456
#1,456
clarksvol00 said:
Edit: maybe you can explain your point. Why is it relevant that fox news has "fine women" and other networks have "baskets of crows?" @BreatheUT
Click to expand...

I noted that not only do they have very attractive commentators, most are intellegent and don't sound like psychopaths.

As far as cnn and msnbc - not only do they have commentators with nasty attitudes and provide misinformation these attributes make add to their already unattractiveness i.e. Rachel Maddow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#1,457
#1,457
BreatheUT said:
I noted that not only do they have very attractive commentators, most are intellegent and don't sound like psychopaths.

As far as cnn and msnbc - not only do they have commentators with nasty attitudes and provide misinformation these attributes make add to their already unattractiveness i.e. Rachel Maddow.
Click to expand...

I guess, insanity, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. I've never been one for cable news flunkies, but you do you.
 
#1,458
#1,458
BreatheUT said:
I noted that not only do they have very attractive commentators, most are intellegent and don't sound like psychopaths.

As far as cnn and msnbc - not only do they have commentators with nasty attitudes and provide misinformation these attributes make add to their already unattractiveness i.e. Rachel Maddow.
Click to expand...
Most are not intelligent. They just know how to gas light. No better or worse then CNN. You just like the flavor of bs ice cream they are serving .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AshG, BowlBrother85, Septic and 1 other person
#1,460
#1,460
Franklin Pierce said:
Click to expand...

I'm not sure whose mistake it was, but somebody obviously misspelled the word "frantically". That's not a good look when you are trying to point out someone else's lack of professionalism.

Also, didn't Tucker Carlson run with the New York Post lie that migrant children at the border were being given Kamala Harris's book in 'welcome packets'? Yes, he did... and he never corrected the record after the story was retracted.
 
Last edited:
#1,461
#1,461
BreatheUT said:
I noted that not only do they have very attractive commentators, most are intellegent and don't sound like psychopaths.

As far as cnn and msnbc - not only do they have commentators with nasty attitudes and provide misinformation these attributes make add to their already unattractiveness i.e. Rachel Maddow.
Click to expand...
How old are you? 16, maybe? That is an adolescent take.

I don't watch CNN, but I've seen enough of both MSNBC and Fox News to understand that they have a lot in common in regards to how they select which events to "report", as well as how much air time to devote to those events. They only differ in party affiliation. A good recent example of this would be the token coverage that Fox News has given to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's holocaust analogy with mask and vaccination mandates. Whenever Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has gone off on one of her nonsensical and unhinged tangents, the Fox News shows give it their undivided and around-the-clock attention. MSNBC does the same thing, but in reverse. You seem to be suggesting that one is more professional than the other. In terms of journalistic integrity, they are the same. Only their political agendas and the party they serve differs.
 
#1,462
#1,462
BowlBrother85 said:
How old are you? 16, maybe? That is an adolescent take.

I don't watch CNN, but I've seen enough of both MSNBC and Fox News to understand that they have a lot in common in regards to how they select which events to "report", as well as how much air time to devote to those events. They only differ in party affiliation. A good recent example of this would be the token coverage that Fox News has given to Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene's holocaust analogy with mask and vaccination mandates. Whenever Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has gone off on one of her nonsensical and unhinged tangents, the Fox News shows give it their undivided and around-the-clock attention. MSNBC does the same thing, but in reverse. You seem to be suggesting that one is more professional than the other. In terms of journalistic integrity, they are the same. Only their political agendas and the party they serve differs.
Click to expand...

Explain the Covid origins coverage please which is a worldwide humanitarian issue.

This issue more than any other underscores the sheer and brazen incompetence of America's mainstream media. You eat it up like chicken soup.

Sure FoxNews is more right leaning. There is also a big difference in daytime programming, and their nightly opinion shows and they don't hide that eventhough Shannon Bream is more newscaster. Hell they got Chris Wallace and there is not even an anchor remotely close on the other trailing networks. It's like watching The National Enquirer turning to msnbc or cnn, and broadcast news.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#1,463
#1,463
BowlBrother85 said:
I'm not sure whose mistake it was, but somebody obviously misspelled the word "frantically". That's not a good look when you are trying to point out someone else's lack of professionalism.

Also, didn't Tucker Carlson run with the New York Post lie that migrant children at the border were being given Kamala Harris's book in 'welcome packets'? Yes, he did... and he never corrected the record after the story was retracted.
Click to expand...

Tuesday, May 25 Scoreboard: Fox News Remains No. 1; Tucker Carlson and Rachel Maddow Have 2 Most-Watched Shows

Tucker Carlson, Hannity, The Five lead cable news among the demo.
 
#1,465
#1,465
BreatheUT said:
Explain the Covid origins coverage please which is a worldwide humanitarian issue.

This issue more than any other underscores the sheer and brazen incompetence of America's mainstream media. You eat it up like chicken soup.

Sure FoxNews is more right leaning. There is also a big difference in daytime programming, and their nightly opinion shows and they don't hide that eventhough Shannon Bream is more newscaster. Hell they got Chris Wallace and there is not even an anchor remotely close on the other trailing networks. It's like watching The National Enquirer turning to msnbc or cnn, and broadcast news.
Click to expand...
You aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room:

Fox News is being sued by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic for good reason.

Their opinion shows allowed Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani to make some provably false claims, without performing any scrutiny of them. It wouldn't have taken much critical analysis to de-bunk some of the allegations that Powell and Giuliani were making. However, Fox News left the fact checking up to other outlets, while their hosts just nodded approvingly with whatever nonsense those two clowns were saying.
 
#1,466
#1,466
BowlBrother85 said:
You aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room:

Fox News is being sued by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic for good reason.

Their opinion shows allowed Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani to make some provably false claims, without performing any scrutiny of them. It wouldn't have taken much critical analysis to de-bunk some of the allegations that Powell and Giuliani were making. However, Fox News left the fact checking up to other outlets, while their hosts just nodded approvingly with whatever nonsense those two clowns were saying.
Click to expand...

 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
#1,467
#1,467
BowlBrother85 said:
You aren't acknowledging the elephant in the room:

Fox News is being sued by Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic for good reason.

Their opinion shows allowed Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani to make some provably false claims, without performing any scrutiny of them. It wouldn't have taken much critical analysis to de-bunk some of the allegations that Powell and Giuliani were making. However, Fox News left the fact checking up to other outlets, while their hosts just nodded approvingly with whatever nonsense those two clowns were saying.
Click to expand...

Nice deflection. You've parlayed that skill into expertise.

You seem to have selective recall. Dominion has been the subject of question voting security for a decade or so.
 
#1,468
#1,468
BreatheUT said:
Nice deflection. You've parlayed that skill into expertise.

You seem to have selective recall. Dominion has been the subject of question voting security for a decade or so.
Click to expand...
That wasn't deflection. The subject of the thread is Tucker Carlson. He is among the hosts who allowed Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani to spread lies about Dominion Voting Systems and Smartmatic... and whatever you are trying to infer about Dominion, it doesn't change the provable lies about them that Powell had told on Fox News, including this:

Sidney Powell claimed that she had evidence that Dominion "was created to produce voting results in Venezuela for Hugo Chavez," and that it had been imported to do the same for Democrats. This is a downright comical lie.
 
#1,472
#1,472
Fox News’ The Five Dominates Timeslot, and Most Cable News Shows, in Wednesday Ratings


Fox’s The Five just can’t be stopped. Fox News’ late-afternoon ratings juggernaut – which said goodbye to longtime liberal co-host Juan Williams – not only won its timeslot in Wednesday ratings, but topped nearly all cable news programming across the board, according to Nielsen data.


Wednesday Ratings: Fox's The Five Dominates Timeslot, Most Cable News
 
#1,473
#1,473
Fox News and Donna Brazile Quietly Part Ways


Fox News and Donna Brazile have quietly parted ways after she spent more than two years with the network as an on-air political analyst, the former Democratic National Committee chairwoman confirmed Friday.

The prominent Democrat’s departure is one of several recent, high-profile exits from the network, including Fox & Friends Weekend co-host Jedediah Bila and White House correspondent Kristin Fisher, who recently jumped to Brazile’s old home of CNN.

Brazile leaving Fox News also gives the network one less liberal pundit to fill Juan Williams’ now-open slot on the opinion roundtable show The Five. After Williams’ sudden exit from the show—which Fox News insiders blamed on co-host Greg Gutfeld—Fox News said it would try out a rotating series of liberal commentators to take his place.

Fox News and Donna Brazile Quietly Part Ways
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#1,474
#1,474
BreatheUT said:
Fox News and Donna Brazile Quietly Part Ways


Fox News and Donna Brazile have quietly parted ways after she spent more than two years with the network as an on-air political analyst, the former Democratic National Committee chairwoman confirmed Friday.

The prominent Democrat’s departure is one of several recent, high-profile exits from the network, including Fox & Friends Weekend co-host Jedediah Bila and White House correspondent Kristin Fisher, who recently jumped to Brazile’s old home of CNN.

Brazile leaving Fox News also gives the network one less liberal pundit to fill Juan Williams’ now-open slot on the opinion roundtable show The Five. After Williams’ sudden exit from the show—which Fox News insiders blamed on co-host Greg Gutfeld—Fox News said it would try out a rotating series of liberal commentators to take his place.

Fox News and Donna Brazile Quietly Part Ways
Click to expand...
So much for the network which used to market themselves as being "fair and balanced". Fox News has rid themselves of all the dissenting opinions, and they have become nothing more than just an echo chamber for Trump minions. Fox News really can't even be called "right-wing propaganda" anymore. It's purely "Trump propaganda" now.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top