camp_steveo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2009
- Messages
- 2,160
- Likes
- 3,305
Not sure how things in the military are these days, but when I was in from 99-05, it was mostly conservatives. One thing that influenced that was the way Clinton handled things in Somalia, but something I noticed myself was that when Clinton was POTUS we were always low on ammo. Once Bush took over we had more than we could shoot, some of that could be attributed to 9/11. Still, the fact that we literally walked around saying 'bang, bang' because we didn't have ammo while we were doing training exercises was sad.The Democrats are unbelievably authoritarian and dictatorial. They hate the First Amendment Just as much as the Second now. Here is Swallwell suggesting us military troops no longer be allowed to watch Fox News.
Eric Swalwell Wants to Ban Conservative News From the Military
Americans of all political persuasions should be appalled.
Most of the politicians in DC are only there to either get rich off insider knowledge investment strategies, or to stay in power no matter what the cost, or both. The corruption is plain as the nose on our collective face.Am I still appalled at the gov dirty tactics? What would shock me is if they did something right and for the good of the people. We have come into a state of being where the gov is only here to harm and they are really good at it. They can make people lives so miserable that they give up hope of right and wrong being clearly addressed and Justice served.
Most of the politicians in DC are only there to either get rich off insider knowledge investment strategies, or to stay in power no matter what the cost, or both. The corruption is plain as the nose on our collective face.
I still like the idea of making politicians wear Nascar uniforms with their donors on them.
Not fair. Jerry Nadler has a LOT more room for sponsorshipsMost of the politicians in DC are only there to either get rich off insider knowledge investment strategies, or to stay in power no matter what the cost, or both. The corruption is plain as the nose on our collective face.
I still like the idea of making politicians wear Nascar uniforms with their donors on them.
Am I still appalled at the gov dirty tactics? What would shock me is if they did something right and for the good of the people. We have come into a state of being where the gov is only here to harm and they are really good at it. They can make people lives so miserable that they give up hope of right and wrong being clearly addressed and Justice served.
James Rosen: Obama Treated Media Worse Than TrumpThe Democrats are unbelievably authoritarian and dictatorial. They hate the First Amendment Just as much as the Second now. Here is Swallwell suggesting us military troops no longer be allowed to watch Fox News.
Eric Swalwell Wants to Ban Conservative News From the Military
Government is not inherently an enemy of the people. It is necessary and proper and the alternative (anarchy) is unthinkable. But like every other human institution, it seeks to ever grow its reach and power, initially for good as it tries to fulfill its intended mission; but later for its own preservation.Uhhh... can you blame the prople for thinking that?
Americans of all political persuasions should be appalled.
They āaskedā. Yeah right. Sort of like Don Corleone āaskingā for a little favor. Absolutely no intimidation there whatsoeverSerious question, what did you guys want the government to do about the Twitter files? Act like it didn't happen? I'm sure all of you would find that problematic. If you want them to do something about it, you have to have hearings. I'm not sitting through 2.5 hrs of this hearing, but the first few minutes seem to be exactly what you guys would want them to be focusing on.
All I got so far through the grape vine is that they asked Taibbi for the names of some journalists. OK, that's a little concerning. What else?
They āaskedā. Yeah right. Sort of like Don Corleone āaskingā for a little favor. Absolutely no intimidation there whatsoever
Serious question, what did you guys want the government to do about the Twitter files? Act like it didn't happen? I'm sure all of you would find that problematic. If you want them to do something about it, you have to have hearings. I'm not sitting through 2.5 hrs of this hearing, but the first few minutes seem to be exactly what you guys would want them to be focusing on.
All I got so far through the grape vine is that they asked Taibbi for the names of some journalists. OK, that's a little concerning. What else?
Hearings yes. I am glad they are doing this. The Democrats however are tripping all over themselves to show which one can emulate their partyās chosen animal mascot most faithfullyOK, so is that it? Did he give him the names? I suppose he'll die now.
Do you agree that the expectation for the government would normally be that they hold hearings for this?
Yes, a sitting congressman/woman/whatever demanding a journalist reveal confidential sources is just a big no no. It is unethical and not so thinly veiled intimidation. If the Republicans demanded something similar of a CNN/MSNBC/WaPo/NY Times reporter it would be the lead story 24x7 for a couple of weeksthey shouldn't do anything about the Twitter Files.
they should examine the extent to which the government tried to shape the speech policies of media organizations. that's a BFD.
demanding that journalists share their sources is bad. Schumer calling on Fox to shut down Carlson is bad. calling journalists hacks and conspiracy theorists because you don't like their product is bad.
overall, it's disturbing that both parties increasingly seek to exercise leverage over what media companies can and cannot publish/air.
they shouldn't do anything about the Twitter Files.
they should examine the extent to which the government tried to shape the speech policies of media organizations. that's a BFD.
demanding that journalists share their sources is bad. Schumer calling on Fox to shut down Carlson is bad. calling journalists hacks and conspiracy theorists because you don't like their product is bad.
overall, it's disturbing that both parties increasingly seek to exercise leverage over what media companies can and cannot publish/air.
Just whistle right on by the demands to reveal sources.How do you do that without these hearings?
You think it's bad for congress to call journalists hacks according to their judgment? Seems like an unreasonable expectation to put on anybody. We should be able to say those things about journalists.