Pacer92
Youneverknow
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2009
- Messages
- 15,821
- Likes
- 18,540
The problem with that idea is that we will never know FOR SURE. There still is no proof on who conducted the attacks in 2013. However, there is a hell of a lot of evidence showing that Syrian government forces were responsible. Same thing in 2017..
Case for Syrian government forces being responsible (only unclassified information included): Aerial dispersal patterns which could only be possible from an air drop. Rebel forces do not have this capability. Syrian government known to possess Syrin gas and the capability to weaponize. Not believed that rebel forces are capable of the same. Radar imagery showing Syrian planes taking off from the airfield before the attack and returning shortly after.
Case for Syrian government not being responsible: A claim that the rebels were storing Syrin gas (which they are not know to have the capabilities to make) and that specific stockpile suffered a direct hit in an airstrike. There is no evidence to back up this claim.
While it is good to always be cautious, in cases such as this the unclassified evidence is overwhelmingly pointing in one direction. And if you're waiting for 100% solid proof, you'll never get it because it's impossible. There is no DNA evidence linking the killer to the crime scene so to speak.
I'll buy most of this....
However, ISIS has ransacked two countries....taking on two militaries(one being US equipped and trained), Iraq and Syria,(dated and Russian equipped)...for 6-7 years now...
I don't believe for a second that they don't have the ability to make or weaponize chemical agents..