U.S. Launches Millitary Strike Against Syria (merged)

Do you agree with Trump's decision to strike Syria?


  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
17883688_10154421129891179_7555006456804281399_n.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
So, you got a little knowledge, eh; but with your knowledge you have no understanding.

Weaponized mustard, chlorine, sarin, etc. are totally, absolutely indescriminate. Covering MANY MAGNITUDES of target radius over conventional weapons. Which accuracy is becoming incredibly precise in my lifetime.
But gas and biologicals seep into the hiding places of noncombatant innocents horrifically killing or infecting those who become infectous then spread disease, then killing . More horrific still are nuclear WMD. With the Geneva conventions and nuclear non-proliferation; in the last century mankind has for the first time sought to limit the methods and means of war to recognized combatants only. The killing of civilians cannot be and is not condoned. So for nuclear Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD) was implemented along with non-proliferation to forego another use of nuclear weapons. Treatys banning gas and biologicals were signed.

So OF COURSE the numbers for Sarin are veeery leeetle.

1st Image: Reality

2nd Image: How OuterBanksVol sees himself

Sorry to be brutally honest, but your post is completely moronic. Pretty much all of it on nearly every level.

Just sit back in an upright and locked position, and enjoy the ride.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
Watched some of the Mattis/Votel press conference. Glad these guys are at the helm.

Mattis said in no uncertain terms that they know exactly who planned and executed the CE attack (Syria/Assad). So for all you false flaggers I assume you believe Mattis is lying?

Mad dog is awesome. Masterson seems to be a good influence on Trump, as well.

Honestly, I'd trust Ivanka at the helm all day long over Oompa Loompa.
 
oh yeah, forgot about that - not a single one supported taking out Osama...

As I recollect, their support for the operation was... reluctant, at best. Within days they were criticizing for not having done it earlier. Then they mocked the pic of him in the situation room and implied he had nothing to do with the go decision.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
As I recollect, their support for the operation was... reluctant, at best. Within days they were criticizing for not having done it earlier. Then they mocked the pic of him in the situation room and implied he had nothing to do with the go decision.

As someone stated before, that was a situation where it might have been better to ask for forgiveness rather than beg for permission.

And it really bit him in the backside in the long run.
 
The only way to keep an opposing force from launching their planes is to destroy the planes and their requisite logistics chain. Cratering a runway is, at best, a temporary inconvenience.

What did they actually hit, then? Because they were back in business the next day.
 
As I recollect, their support for the operation was... reluctant, at best. Within days they were criticizing for not having done it earlier. Then they mocked the pic of him in the situation room and implied he had nothing to do with the go decision.

weak sauce bro, weak sauce
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Many of the people listed as inmates have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. I still think Assad is a necessary evil, because there are people way worse than him that will rise to power if he is removed.

keep digging into a jail break he had right before ISIS rose up and some of those names.....
 

VN Store



Back
Top