- Joined
- Nov 23, 2012
- Messages
- 77,220
- Likes
- 112,574
The fact is that John Kerry planted his lips firmly on the ass of the Ayatollah which then emboldened them and led to this "necessity"It seems like this ^^^^ is a prepared narrative from the right, regardless of the circumstances involved. As of right now, this is what the Pentagon has confirmed:
"The U.S. military carried out a single air strike in Syria against a single location used by Iranian backed militias. Multiple facilities at this location were struck during the attack. President Biden authorized the strike in response to three separate rocket attacks against U.S. forces in Iraq."
Can anyone explain what is wrong with this? This is not a case of interventionism. It's a response to military aggression against U.S. forces.
It's basically the same thing that played out in January of 2020... and led to Iran shooting down Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 - which was never met with a response.The fact is that John Kerry planted his lips firmly on the ass of the Ayatollah which then emboldened them and led to this "necessity"
I think it could be easily argued that outside interference from various countries, including the U.S., is what has led to the rise of such militant groups. Other than appeasing "allies", I'm not sure what U.S. interests are being served by keeping a military presence in the region.Standing idly by is what gave rise to the Taliban and Al Qaeda, taking the fight to them is what keeps these radicals off our shores.
Actually invading Iraq and creating a power vacuum did more for that than standing idly by. In fact standing idly by would have been an improvement. Take another gulp of freedom fluid.Standing idly by is what gave rise to the Taliban and Al Qaeda, taking the fight to them is what keeps these radicals off our shores.
I think it could be easily argued that outside interference from various countries, including the U.S., is what has led to the rise of such militant groups. Other than appeasing "allies", I'm not sure what U.S. interests are being served by keeping a military presence in the region.
Actually invading Iraq and creating a power vacuum did more for that than standing idly by. In fact standing idly by would have been an improvement. Take another gulp of freedom fluid.