South Alabama being bowl eligible has put a lot of heat on UAB as well. There just aren't enough players and bowls to support all these division 1 teams in Alabama.
I didn't believe the BOT vs UAB stuff until the Jimbo situation. It was completely unwarranted. To make matters worse, the board foisted Neil Calloway on the Blazers in Jimbo's place (Calloway had ties to someone on the board but was not one of the original options under serious consideration in addition to Fisher). Calloway nearly killed the program via sheer incompetence.
The stadium fiasco was another last minute move by the BOT.
I spoke with Coach Clark this Summer and he indicated that he was having trouble getting permission to spend on facilities even though the money for the specific improvements he sought was available in the budget. Looking back, it sounds like they were already moving towards the axe.
At an absolute minimum the BOT has not been transparent when dealing with UAB Football. At worst, members on the BOT are actively working to shut down the program.
There are lots of coincidences here - too many to not at least merit investigation.
Likewise, UAB Administration has not been transparent.
Sad state of affairs.
Someone needs to take 5 minutes to learn how public university systems are organized and governed.
A nice, thorough article about the situation (written a couple weeks ago).
Is the Alabama board of trustees finally ready to kill UAB football? - CBSSports.com
Almost like a college football version of The Natural. Board consistently blocks any major attempt to improve facilities and hire quality coaches. They put in place stooges (Watts) who will do their bidding. They allow Clark's hiring in the belief that he would not be able to do enough to alter their plans. Problem is that he has taken UAB to a 6-6 record and an increase in attendance of 120-130%.
Don't know if he's done enough to save them against the odds. But he has managed to generate enough interest in the program for the community, students, and alumni to fight for its survival. This in turn has put a regional and increasingly national spotlight on the Bammer rats on their BOT. They don't like the exposure.
It'll be interesting to see if those trying to weaken UAB decide to call it off and try again in some other way.
End football and you hurt the athletic department as a whole. Kill the athletic programs and you damage enrollment at the university. Weaken the university and guess who is left to pick up the best parts of it when it is no longer feasible to operate?
Suggesting that shutting down a 23 year old football program will "weaken the university" is hyperventilating.
I disagree.
First, this will be more than shutting down a football team - it will be shutting down many sports to comply with Title IX.
You know more about UAB's bottom line that I do, so I won't argue those points. But I will disagree on the Title IX issue.
There are cheaper male sports that UAB could simply add to make up the difference. Shoot, they don't currently sponsor track and cross-country. It's a heck of a lot cheaper to maintain those sports than football.