UFC Thread

In my opinion, there is a certain level of dominance that can't be achieved without finishing an opponent.

Anderson and Bones are the 2 best fighters on the planet, not only because they dominate fights, but they also finish them.

Not worth it.
 
I think it's stupid that people discredit fighters because they aren't "entertaining."

Sadly, if you want to make money you have to sell tickets. Keep being a boring azz fighter and you'll be out as soon as you lose your title.
Seen Shurk lately?
 
Sadly, if you want to make money you have to sell tickets. Keep being a boring azz fighter and you'll be out as soon as you lose your title.
Seen Shurk lately?

I agree with your first sentence. But let's be honest, Dana White is not going to cut an undefeated fighter with no finishes. If you win, you will stay.

I think the problem is this; wrestling, by nature, is not entertaining. People want to see the one-punch knockouts and sweet submissions. But just because the wrestler isn't a finisher doesn't mean he is inferior.
 
You think a lot of stuff is stupid. You must be a true joy to be around in the real world. So serial all the time.

If something is stupid, I'm going to call you on it. Maybe you aren't aware of it. You could call what I'm doing a public service.
 
I agree with your first sentence. But let's be honest, Dana White is not going to cut an undefeated fighter with no finishes. If you win, you will stay.

I think the problem is this; wrestling, by nature, is not entertaining. People want to see the one-punch knockouts and sweet submissions. But just because the wrestler isn't a finisher doesn't mean he is inferior.

I disagree on your assertion that wrestling is boring. When a fighter lays in guard and does nothing like Tito then yes it's boring. But the fighters who pass guard and pound people out are very entertaining.

Like this guy
RandyCoutour.jpg
 
If something is stupid, I'm going to call you on it. Maybe you aren't aware of it. You could call what I'm doing a public service.

I've never seen you post something non beechy. Actually I would call it being an azz just to be an azz. But hey you obviously take this internet policing gig to heart. I hope it pays well.
 
I disagree on your assertion that wrestling is boring. When a fighter lays in guard and does nothing like Tito then yes it's boring. But the fighters who pass guard and pound people out are very entertaining.

Like this guy
RandyCoutour.jpg

I agree, styles don't make boring fights, the fighters do. Look at the Rashad-Lil Nog fight they stood the whole time, and it was one of the most boring fights I've seen in awhile.
 
I agree with your first sentence. But let's be honest, Dana White is not going to cut an undefeated fighter with no finishes. If you win, you will stay.

I think the problem is this; wrestling, by nature, is not entertaining. People want to see the one-punch knockouts and sweet submissions. But just because the wrestler isn't a finisher doesn't mean he is inferior.

False
 

VN Store



Back
Top