UFO 60 minute interview

[Zues1]

It makes me mad when people basically laugh in the face at people who claim to have seen something paranormal.

Paranormal by definition means beyond the scope of normal scientific understanding.

In the past their have been law enforcement and other non nutjobs from all over the world that have reported seeing unexplained objects.
A number of Apollo astronauts claimed to have seen unexplained things. Now we have former & current US Military personnel going on record that they have seen objects with visual evidence.

It is said that the number of Galaxies in the Universe equal the number of grains of sand in all the beaches of world. Each one is thought to have at least one earth like planet.

The closest known galaxy to us is the Canis Major Dwarf galaxy, (25,000 light years) from the Sun.
With our current technology it would take man 37,200 years to travel ONE light year.

 

[RikidyBones]

The closest known galaxy to us is the Canis Major Dwarf galaxy, (25,000 light years) from the Sun.
With our current technology it would take man 37,200 years to travel ONE light year.

We are fairly primitive. We only began to be civilized 6,000 years ago. No one is arguing our technology is there yet.

 

[Sea Ray]

It makes me mad when people basically laugh in the face at people who claim to have seen something paranormal.

Paranormal by definition means beyond the scope of normal scientific understanding.

In the past their have been law enforcement and other non nutjobs from all over the world that have reported seeing unexplained objects.
A number of Apollo astronauts claimed to have seen unexplained things. Now we have former & current US Military personnel going on record that they have seen objects with visual evidence.

It is said that the number of Galaxies in the Universe equal the number of grains of sand in all the beaches of world. Each one is thought to have at least one earth like planet.

I think the analogy is stars/grains of sand and not galaxies but I'm also certain that there are far more earth-like planets than one in each galaxy

 

[Hunerwadel]

Would someone please leak a clear, sharp in focus image of one of these things. Some of our ships and aircraft surely have some decent imaging equipment on board. Our various satellites take thousands of images and videos of earth every day. They should have captured a few good shots at some point along the way.

 

[RikidyBones]

Would someone please leak a clear, sharp in focus image of one of these things. Some of our ships and aircraft surely have some decent imaging equipment on board. Our various satellites take thousands of images and videos of earth every day. They should have captured a few good shots at some point along the way.

Here's one

 

[PEPPERJAX]

Here's one
View attachment 369217

 

[Zues1]

Would someone please leak a clear, sharp in focus image of one of these things. Some of our ships and aircraft surely have some decent imaging equipment on board. Our various satellites take thousands of images and videos of earth every day. They should have captured a few good shots at some point along the way.

They are archived with the clear bigfoot and ghost images. The gov will be releasing these soon.

 

[Septic]

We are fairly primitive. We only began to be civilized 6,000 years ago. No one is arguing our technology is there yet.

That's a good point, of the 6000ish years it's only been the last 118 where we've gone from the first heavier than air plane to flying a helicopter on Mars.

It's impossible to fathom what another 6,000 years of scientific discovery could bring. Imagine the possibilities when something like cold fusion is worked out.

We feel like we're advanced, imagine races or civilizations that are millions or billions of years ahead. We're likely in our infancy as a species.

 

[Sea Ray]

Would someone please leak a clear, sharp in focus image of one of these things. Some of our ships and aircraft surely have some decent imaging equipment on board. Our various satellites take thousands of images and videos of earth every day. They should have captured a few good shots at some point along the way.

The government can't do that w/o admitting that they exist. They will only selectively release photos and they'll be ones like this because they don't think we're ready for the truth yet.

Where are the pictures of the wreckage at Roswell? They're not going to show us that

 

[Zues1]

Some one said Trump was seen the evidence.
Put that guy back on Twitter you know he couldn't be quite about it.

 

[VolFaninFla]

Did they explain why all the women on the moon have purple hair?

They are all Prince fans

 

[Volwark]

No evidence mystery UFOs are alien spacecraft, report finds: NYTimes

One senior official briefed on the report said intelligence and military officials increasingly worry the phenomena could be China or Russia experimenting with hypersonic technology.

 

[davethevol]

No evidence mystery UFOs are alien spacecraft, report finds: NYTimes

And if China/Russia have has this technology since WW2 when all the fighter pilots saw them, well then they must be light years ahead of us. Seriously, whatever these things are, they aren’t man made.

 

[Sea Ray]

If it's China/Russia we got a huge problem.

This is more coverup from our gov't. Apparently they've decided we can't handle the truth. That's fine. I wasn't getting my hopes up that they'd come clean

China failed to land their craft on the moon. Do we really think they can do this? No F'ing way...

 

[hog88]

If they were from Russia (no f-ing way they're Chinese) Russia would have won the cold war.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

No evidence mystery UFOs are alien spacecraft, report finds: NYTimes

So Russia & China who still have turboprop bombers also have technologically advanced aircraft that defies the known laws of physics?

 

[Sea Ray]

Once again our gov't insults our intelligence. It's getting to be a common occurrence

 

[SamRebel35]

I see two possibilities:

1) this is our own tech and we're trying to scare the sh*t out of China by releasing footage of it and playing dumb by claiming it is some unknown space craft.

2) it is is fake, but we want China to think it is real and they will draw the conclusion that it is our own tech.

It isn't aliens and it isn't China or Russia. It is either ours or it is fake. I'm leaning towards fake. It is a psyop.

 

[davethevol]

I see two possibilities:

1) this is our own tech and we're trying to scare the sh*t out of China by releasing footage of it and playing dumb by claiming it is some unknown space craft.

2) it is is fake, but we want China to think it is real and they will draw the conclusion that it is our own tech.

It isn't aliens and it isn't China or Russia. It is either ours or it is fake. I'm leaning towards fake. It is a psyop.

Some of it may be a psyop, but not all of it. The fighter pilots that saw them in WW2 for both the Allies and the Axis pretty much gives credence to them being real.

Foo fighter - Wikipedia

 

[Septic]

I see two possibilities:

1) this is our own tech and we're trying to scare the sh*t out of China by releasing footage of it and playing dumb by claiming it is some unknown space craft.

2) it is is fake, but we want China to think it is real and they will draw the conclusion that it is our own tech.

It isn't aliens and it isn't China or Russia. It is either ours or it is fake. I'm leaning towards fake. It is a psyop.

How can you dismiss the theory that the origins of the "craft" are extra terrestrial?

Given that they defy what we understand about physics and propulsion, all ideas should be on the table however personally absurd. I think it's myopic to believe since we can't reconcile it, it must be fake.

 

[Septic]

So Russia & China who still have turboprop bombers also have technologically advanced aircraft that defies the known laws of physics?

It's possible that it's Russian or Chinese, but since they are still having to rip off American R&D for damn near everything else and it'd be a secret they've maintained for decades (or longer) it seems like a stretch to think it'd be our adversaries,

 

[SamRebel35]

How can you dismiss the theory that the origins of the "craft" are extra terrestrial?

Given that they defy what we understand about physics and propulsion, all ideas should be on the table however personally absurd. I think it's myopic to believe since we can't reconcile it, it must be fake.

The probability of aliens existing is low, the probability of them existing within travel distance from earth is much lower, the probability of them being more advanced than us is low. You've got several compounding low probability events that come out to it being a near impossibility. Of course, I suppose it is very remotely possible, so you can't technically rule it out, but it is low enough probability that I feel safe saying that these aren't alien crafts.

 

[Sea Ray]

The probability of aliens existing is low, the probability of them existing within travel distance from earth is much lower, the probability of them being more advanced than us is low. You've got several compounding low probability events that come out to it being a near impossibility. Of course, I suppose it is very remotely possible, so you can't technically rule it out, but it is low enough probability that I feel safe saying that these aren't alien crafts.

I disagree with points one and three.

Considering that there are more stars out there than we can count, how can one say that the probability of intelligent life out there is low? Are you saying that chances are we're the only life in the universe?

The universe is 13.8 billion yrs old. Mankind is about 100K years old. How can you say that there's very little chance that another civilization is more advanced? Hell, another civilization could be a million yrs more advanced and we'd still have 13.7 billion yrs to spare

 

[SamRebel35]

I disagree with points one and three.

Considering that there are more stars out there than we can count, how can one say that the probability of intelligent life out there is low? Are you saying that chances are we're the only life in the universe?

The universe is 13.8 billion yrs old. Mankind is about 100K years old. How can you say that there's very little chance that another civilization is more advanced? Hell, another civilization could be a million yrs more advanced and we'd still have 13.7 billion yrs to spare

You're making my point for me. Out of 14 billion years, we've only existed 100 k. That's pretty low probability. So to add to the low probabilities from before, a further compounding low probability event would be advanced/intelligent life existing at the same time in the same universe out of a 14 billion year continuum.

 

[Sea Ray]

You're making my point for me. Out of 14 billion years, we've only existed 100 k. That's pretty low probability. So to add to the low probabilities from before, a further compounding low probability event would be advanced/intelligent life existing at the same time in the same universe out of a 14 billion year continuum.

There are 100 billion stars in our galaxy alone. There are 125 billion galaxies. That's a lot of probabilities