hatvol96
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2005
- Messages
- 49,979
- Likes
- 18
You folks are just kidding yourselfs. This is the best Vandy team in years. They are much more athletic and deep than previous Vandy teams. I certainly don't want to sound like MHF, but I told you before the game that Vandy would give us all we want and then some. The KY game will not be a 15+ game, although I do expect KY to win at home.I agree. Vandy is not significantly better than they were last year. I bet UK beats them 15+.
No Timmy, I am saying that UGA is not a bad team and given they have beaten Illinois, it should tell us a lot that the last place SEC East team is better than half the Big 10.
The teams in the SEC that are locks to the tournament are Kentucky, Tennessee, Vanderbilt and Ole Miss. Mississippi State, Florida and even South Carolina all have a shot without winning the SEC Tournament. Any of those three would need an extraordinary run (for South Carolina almost an impossible one like losing only 2 more games for the rest of conference play) but all have a chance. No one else in the SEC has a chance they would need to win the SECT to get in like Miss State did last year.
The SEC gets 5 or 6 teams in the tournament. The Big 10 gets less than the SEC and is a worse conference. That is what I have said all year.
[/B][/B]You folks are just kidding yourselfs. This is the best Vandy team in years. They are much more athletic and deep than previous Vandy teams. I certainly don't want to sound like MHF, but I told you before the game that Vandy would give us all we want and then some. The KY game will not be a 15+ game, although I do expect KY to win at home.
Unless KY lays an egg, they'll kill Vandy.Vandy is a very good team . . . I would bet money that they beat UK if it were at Memorial Gym. I still think they might win on Sat. Vandy just has a good combo of inside guys and outside sharpshooters like jenkins and beal. Their team may be the most athletic in the league and they are also very well coached
6 Bids for the Big 10....hahahahahahahahah...Minnesota could still make it in as the 5th team if they finish well, you know they have an RPI pretty much like...Oh yeah, Florida...the suck team.
Teams I said were strong who people here disagreed with including the "experts"
UNLV, Richmond, Charlotte, Missouri.
The mean thing to do would be to ask him for proof of anyone saying UNLV and Missouri weren't pretty good. Emain's been hyping Richmond all year and Charlotte's not going to make the NCAA Tournament.This crusade has become senseless. I doubt you'll stumble ass backward into getting some right, but you might. Congratulations. You read other crap, watched little ball and predicted some right, which probability says will happen. Who'da thunk it?
This crusade has become senseless. I doubt you'll stumble ass backward into getting some right, but you might. Congratulations. You read other crap, watched little ball and predicted some right, which probability says will happen. Who'da thunk it?
Teams MikeHamiltonFan has claimed are good: DePaul, Arizona, South Carolina, Alabama, Florida St., ...
I like this
Show me where I said Depaul was good? I said they would win a Big East game this year and they did.
I said Arizona would not be the worst team in 20 years, and I will probably end up being wrong on that. If I am right and Hat is wrong, they cannot lose more than 3 games the rest of the Pac 10 schedule which is possible but unlikely.
South Carolina back when I said they were good had 2 players who were excellent who got hurt. Wow...Guess people who said Cincy was great were idiots because K Mart was injured.
Alabama and Florida State are good. Maybe good means different things to you guys. To me it does not mean top 25. When a team is top 25 type talent I say that I think they are.
By the way, we have two more months before the archives come out on the people who said Charlotte and Missouri etc sucked. Almost everyone who said that is in this thread.
The Big 10 is not as good as the SEC...
I do not regularly read what anyone says about basketball except Gary Parrish and I certainly am not taking any cues from him on prognostication. I do watch basketball a lot, maybe too much. That is how I knew that the Big 10 had zero chance of 6 bids.[/QUOTE]
You have a very liberal view of good to put Alabama in that category. The main thing you do too much is make stupid predictions.
If Alabama is good, there are roughly 150 good teams this year.Show me where I said Depaul was good? I said they would win a Big East game this year and they did.
I said Arizona would not be the worst team in 20 years, and I will probably end up being wrong on that. If I am right and Hat is wrong, they cannot lose more than 3 games the rest of the Pac 10 schedule which is possible but unlikely.
South Carolina back when I said they were good had 2 players who were excellent who got hurt. Wow...Guess people who said Cincy was great were idiots because K Mart was injured.
Alabama and Florida State are good. Maybe good means different things to you guys. To me it does not mean top 25. When a team is top 25 type talent I say that I think they are.
By the way, we have two more months before the archives come out on the people who said Charlotte and Missouri etc sucked. Almost everyone who said that is in this thread.
The Big 10 is not as good as the SEC...
I do not regularly read what anyone says about basketball except Gary Parrish and I certainly am not taking any cues from him on prognostication. I do watch basketball a lot, maybe too much. That is how I knew that the Big 10 had zero chance of 6 bids.[/QUOTE]
You have a very liberal view of good to put Alabama in that category. The main thing you do too much is make stupid predictions.
Posted via VolNation Mobile