NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,017
- Likes
- 82,951
gonna go out on a limb here, but why don't we just try to stay below the debt limit?The # 1 reason for the downgrade is the increasing difficulty we have had in adjusting the debt limit. Most recently that was due to the antics of the Freedom Caucus. And they show no signs of tempering their theatrics, quite the opposite in fact.
You can theorize all you want about an alternative hypothetical universe in which we have either no or very low national debt, but that is not the reality we face.
I'm all for SANE, LEVEL HEADED people running for Congress or President on a platform of reducing the debt, with reasonable and practical solutions over time to achieve that goal. But the histrionics of Freedom Caucus types, insinuating themselves into the discussions and negotiations by the adults, is not helping anyone.
Shifting the burden of the various 2000s financial crises into our currency brought this about, so bush, obama, trump, and biden share in the blame as far as party politics go. Probably we should look at the economists who pushed us into these policies to determine who is truly to blame.
Our policy concerning debt became irresponsible more recently. Carrying some debt makes sense. I dont remember getting a refund check/not buying your vote attempt at all check until bush. The nation's fiscal irresponsibility picked up significantly under him and his successors.Hell it goes back decades, no 1 party or president owns it completely.
Shifting the burden of the various 2000s financial crises into our currency brought this about, so bush, obama, trump, and biden share in the blame as far as party politics go. Probably we should look at the economists who pushed us into these policies to determine who is truly to blame.
Our policy concerning debt became irresponsible more recently. Carrying some debt makes sense. I dont remember getting a refund check/not buying your vote attempt at all check until bush. The nation's fiscal irresponsibility picked up significantly under him and his successors.
Then why is the vegetable in the WH continually claiming to have lowered the deficit by over $1T FFS?! Puddinhead is pissing on you and telling you it’s raining and you’re out dancing in it.Everyone here realizes that administrations from both parties have added to the debt. Everyone here wants a solution that does not throw the economy into absolute chaos. Everyone here realizes that this necessarily means coming up with plans for change on a 25 to 50 year timeframe, not a 25 to 50 day timeframe.
But its kind of like the border. Both sides like to complain the other is screwing it up so as to run on it as an issue in the next campaign, and so they are incentivized not to actually resolve anything.
yeah it has nothing to do with the actual debt numbers being insanely high, or the actual deficit being insanely high. Or that no one is actually willing to sacrifice their own sacred cow to avoid dealing with a default.The # 1 reason for the downgrade is the increasing difficulty we have had in adjusting the debt limit. Most recently that was due to the antics of the Freedom Caucus. And they show no signs of tempering their theatrics, quite the opposite in fact.
You can theorize all you want about an alternative hypothetical universe in which we have either no or very low national debt, but that is not the reality we face.
I'm all for SANE, LEVEL HEADED people running for Congress or President on a platform of reducing the debt, with reasonable and practical solutions over time to achieve that goal. But the histrionics of Freedom Caucus types, insinuating themselves into the discussions and negotiations by the adults, is not helping anyone.
those dang tea baggersThe # 1 reason for the downgrade is the increasing difficulty we have had in adjusting the debt limit. Most recently that was due to the antics of the Freedom Caucus. And they show no signs of tempering their theatrics, quite the opposite in fact.
You can theorize all you want about an alternative hypothetical universe in which we have either no or very low national debt, but that is not the reality we face.
I'm all for SANE, LEVEL HEADED people running for Congress or President on a platform of reducing the debt, with reasonable and practical solutions over time to achieve that goal. But the histrionics of Freedom Caucus types, insinuating themselves into the discussions and negotiations by the adults, is not helping anyone.
and this was all after they double prinky promised they were going to address the issue after we agreed to extend the default until it was much worse.Need to borrow 1 trillion for a quarter, we're fine debt isn't a problem according to @MontyPython
‘Eye-popping’ $1 trillion third-quarter borrowing need from U.S. Treasury raises risk of buyers’ fatigue
Need to borrow 1 trillion for a quarter, we're fine debt isn't a problem according to @MontyPython
‘Eye-popping’ $1 trillion third-quarter borrowing need from U.S. Treasury raises risk of buyers’ fatigue
I'd prefer a reduction in total debt, actually. We can't continue with more $1T+ / quarter deficits.
Having said that, there is no crisis, per se... yet... other than those manufactured for political reasons. Both parties are guilty. But, today's debt payments are actually less than they were throughout all of the Reagan, Bush Sr. and Clinton years (see red line below). To his credit, Clinton was the only President in modern times to (essentially) balance the budget.
And, oh BTW, this is not the first time our almighty AAA bond rating has been plinked by a rating agency.
View attachment 567260
Hey, just want to keep everyone honest. Kinda disingenuous to bitch about or point fingers concerning our credit rating all the while supporting continued borrowing for Ukraine.