Less chaotic than you think. 4/5th of their fan base is pathetic.
Pete Carrol is good for one of these losses a year. Is it talent at USC or coaching? Games like this make me think talent.
Apathy. They play in a conference where they're favored by 3 touchdowns in almost every game. We all know how dangerous the sandwich games can be; most of USC's conference schedule is nothing but sandwich games. If you're Pete Carroll, how do you convince your team that they can conceivably lose a game like that?
Pete Carrol is good for one of these losses a year. Is it talent at USC or coaching? Games like this make me think talent.
Apathy. They play in a conference where they're favored by 3 touchdowns in almost every game. We all know how dangerous the sandwich games can be; most of USC's conference schedule is nothing but sandwich games. If you're Pete Carroll, how do you convince your team that they can conceivably lose a game like that?
I agree with Vercingetorix.
Anytime USC is playing in a big game, they annihilate the other team. It's games like this that they lose, so evidently he has trouble getting them up for games like this. Pete Carroll is a great coach though.
Reminds me of our Labor Day game. We'll see if it continues.Every college coach has trouble getting his teams up for games like this. All teams come out flat sometimes against obviously inferior opponents; most of the times they pull it out, but occasionally they lose. Carroll's particular problem is that most of his conference schedule falls into the "gimme" category. If the team treats road conference games like layups, then they're going to get burned sometimes. Despite the recent history, Carroll apparently isn't having much success at making his team believe they can actually lose to teams like OSU.
Simply put, you'd be hard-pressed to find a dozen people in the Pac-10 region that view college football the way people in the south do. Sure, there are season-ticket holders, and people who have their house/car decked out with their school's gear (Oregon stickers EVERYWHERE in Portland) but the attitude is still completely different. They lost? Oh, that sucks. Move on.Droski quoted a USC fan after their loss to Texas in the title game as saying something like, "Sure it was disappointing that we lost, but we all had a few drinks and had a great time anyway."
I don't deny that it's a healthier attitude towards sports than I have. I envy it, in a way. But that ain't exactly what college football is all about.
Simply put, you'd be hard-pressed to find a dozen people in the Pac-10 region that view college football the way people in the south do. Sure, there are season-ticket holders, and people who have their house/car decked out with their school's gear (Oregon stickers EVERYWHERE in Portland) but the attitude is still completely different. They lost? Oh, that sucks. Move on.
I see it as being kind of a blessing sometimes, though. Particularly, we get to see what coaches can really do out here. Alums, boosters and fans in general will never throw a coach under the bus after one or two seasons. One has to have a good consistency of suckitude before anybody starts calling for their job. Unlike, say, Bama, where they're ready for a new coach after 3 games.
Pretty much. USC has just as much a tradition of winning as any team in the south, but not the fan base to match. And football has been around forever here, as well. Washington, UofO, OSU, Cal, Stanford, USC and UCLA all have football history stretching back well over a century. But people here just don't care in the same way. The stadiums are half the size, and if their team sucks, fans just complain a little bit and move on.
I have no idea as to why that is. It just is.
Pete Carrol said after the game that the Pac-10 is and I quote, "ridiculously hard".....
:lolabove::lolabove::lolabove::lolabove:
Pete Carroll Talks After USC Falls To Oregon State - ESPN Video
So you agree that the Pac-10 is "Ridiculously hard"?