Violence and Protesting Conservatives is alright but not Liberals

#51
#51
He clearly missed our exchange the other day.
Let me know though. I didn’t get anything when I was accused of being in the club

I think you get a MyPillow from Mike Lindell. The case doubles as a hood………………………………..
Im kidding folks. I’m not saying all Trump lovers are in the Klan. Don’t taze me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#52
#52
It was news to me???? I don’t even know any of the handshakes or anything. Should I be expecting a membership packet in the mail?

There aren’t any handshakes. Our Grand Supreme Lord Trump has small hands, remember?
 
#55
#55
Texas man allegedly tells Cruz he'll murder Republicans with 'a brick in your skull,' court frees him on bond

Isaac Nformangum allegedly threatened to kill Cruz and members of the GOP 'by bullet' or by 'brick in your skull.'

A man in the Houston area of Texas was charged with making threats against Sen. Ted Cruz but remains at large after a court let him free on a personal recognizance bond.

Texas man allegedly tells Cruz he'll murder Republicans with 'a brick in your skull,' court frees him on bond
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#56
#56
Texas man allegedly tells Cruz he'll murder Republicans with 'a brick in your skull,' court frees him on bond

Isaac Nformangum allegedly threatened to kill Cruz and members of the GOP 'by bullet' or by 'brick in your skull.'

A man in the Houston area of Texas was charged with making threats against Sen. Ted Cruz but remains at large after a court let him free on a personal recognizance bond.

Texas man allegedly tells Cruz he'll murder Republicans with 'a brick in your skull,' court frees him on bond


In his defense, technically, hitting Ted Cruz in the noggin with a brick wouldn't change much.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#57
#57
In his defense, technically, hitting Ted Cruz in the noggin with a brick wouldn't change much.

Pretty sure he’s argued more cases before SCOTUS than any Senator in the history of this country. And won over 50 %, which is an astonishing amount considering that as the SG of the state of Texas, he was tasked with arguing some pretty indefensible positions. You taking a shot at him is about the equivalent of Butch criticizing Saban. You both did the same job, and he was WAY more successful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
#58
#58
Pretty sure he’s argued more cases before SCOTUS than any Senator in the history of this country. And won an astonishing amount considering that as the SG of the state of Texas, he was tasked with arguing some pretty indefensible positions. You taking a shot at him is about the equivalent of Butch criticizing Saban. You both did the same job, and he was WAY more successful.

I don't think you can assume that his intellect as a lawyer equates to his intellect as a Senator. As to the latter, it has been appeal to the lowest common denominator at every turn. Even if it means contradicting himself within hours.
 
#59
#59
I don't think you can assume that his intellect as a lawyer equates to his intellect as a Senator. As to the latter, it has been appeal to the lowest common denominator at every turn. Even if it means contradicting himself within hours.

You didn’t imply that he was a bad Senator. You implied that he was brain damaged or mentally deficient. If you want to imply that he’s morally dubious then thats a separate argument. You’re a lawyer questioning the mental acuity of a man who clerked for a Chief Justice, which is laughable.
 
#60
#60
You didn’t imply that he was a bad Senator. You implied that he was brain damaged or mentally deficient. If you want to imply that he’s morally dubious then thats a separate argument. You’re a lawyer questioning the mental acuity of a man who clerked for a Chief Justice, which is laughable.
Ted Cruz is very intelligent. He probably is morally bankrupt like everyone else in Congress, but he is one of the higher IQ individuals in DC.
 
#61
#61
You didn’t imply that he was a bad Senator. You implied that he was brain damaged or mentally deficient. If you want to imply that he’s morally dubious then thats a separate argument. You’re a lawyer questioning the mental acuity of a man who clerked for a Chief Justice, which is laughable.

He's a Senator now. So his intellect is apparently irrelevant.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRUEFANVol
#63
#63
You didn’t imply that he was a bad Senator. You implied that he was brain damaged or mentally deficient. If you want to imply that he’s morally dubious then thats a separate argument. You’re a lawyer questioning the mental acuity of a man who clerked for a Chief Justice, which is laughable.
For someone with high mental acuity, Cruz has made some bone headed decisions as a Senator. Never mind some of his remarkably stupid comments and spineless behavior.
 
#64
#64
For someone with high mental acuity, Cruz has made some bone headed decisions as a Senator. Never mind some of his remarkably stupid comments and spineless behavior.

As could pretty much be said for all 100 of them. Except for maybe Mike Lee, who is bright/ethical and MOSTLY avoids the nonsensical stuff. And strangely he’s actually facing a serious 3rd party candidate that the idiots in Romney-ville are actually giving serious consideration to.
 
#65
#65
As could pretty much be said for all 100 of them. Except for maybe Mike Lee, who is bright/ethical and MOSTLY avoids the nonsensical stuff. And strangely he’s actually facing a serious 3rd party candidate that the idiots in Romney-ville are actually giving serious consideration to.
Mike Lee??????? LMFAO
 
#69
#69
I know it’s basically all politicians everywhere because of the power and money , but our “ esteemed “ congressmen and women are just disgraceful parasites wedged deeply in a bloated bureaucracy.
I'm old enough to remember the time when our congressional body could set aside their ideological differences and compromise with one another for the benefit of the American people
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#70
#70
I'm old enough to remember the time when our congressional body could set aside their ideological differences and compromise with one another for the benefit of the American people

I think I’m just too jaded and cynical to try to remember now. 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRUEFANVol
#71
#71
I'm old enough to remember the time when our congressional body could set aside their ideological differences and compromise with one another for the benefit of the American people

I think they should go back to dueling. At least let us get some entertainment out of it. I would have to check the Inter-webs but I think one of them actually stabbed another one on the House floor 180 years ago or so
 
Last edited:
#72
#72
That grey area thinking is what got us to where we are today , allows congress to shirk their responsibilities, pass bills full of pork, and federal agencies to think they have the power to make laws, instead of putting the burden of black and white responsibility onto the ones that it belongs on . The federal government is and has been in the business of kidding up the waters , living in grey areas so they can maintain power . We just follow around behind them asking but why when the root cause is glaring .
Then we should stop glaring.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TRUEFANVol
#75
#75
I think they should go back to dueling. At least let us get some entertainment out of it. I would have to check the Inter-webs but I think one of them actually stabbed another one on the House floor 180 years ago or so

Much prefer dueling to compromise. Compromise is how the left has slowly moved everything in their direction. When you give government an inch, they never give that inch back.
 

VN Store



Back
Top