Virginia, MLK day, Accelerationists, Trump, GOP

[ClearwaterVol]

affect

I always f@#k that one up.

 

[vols40]

I always f@#k that one up.

It ain't just that

 

[ClearwaterVol]

But he's so much smarter than all of us conservatives.

I don't even know how to address this one. You should probably refrain from joining the grammar nazis.

 

[vols40]

Not hoping for a riot but fearing a riot might happen.

Lol.
Don't walk it back now.

 

[carlos86]

I would add:
No looting
No busted out windows
No beatings

Nah. Just a bunch of people who are too obese and too stupid to join the military. So they cosplay soldiers in their “militias”.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

More on accelerationists, and promoting gun rights is a key to their strategy.

The extremist philosophy that’s more violent than the alt-right and growing in popularity





The article goes on to explain the origins of it in lesser known extreme right wing academics, views on genetics as setting a natural hierarchy, and its interaction with other right wing movements and political thought, tying it to mainstream figures you might know.

The estimates on extreme right wing people is around 50k in the US. 0.00015152% of the population.

 

[hog88]

Listen, dipsh!t (since we are name calling), I support the 2A. I own guns. I have a concealed carry. I am simply arguing that constitutional rights are not absolute. It is a position shared most every judge in America.

And they are correct, you cannot use a right guaranteed by the constitution to harm others. Any other position is asinine.

 

[1972 Grad]

I am glad you pointed that out. Makes your arguments much more powerful.

I assumed that since you the smartest man in the room, that you might also want to learn how to spell. It adds to your street cred.

 

[lawgator1]

The estimates on extreme right wing people is around 50k in the US. 0.00015152% of the population.

Source on that?

 

[0nelilreb]

But you have argued there is no interpretation necessary. Either the right is not limitless like you argue or you believe in private ownership of nuclear weapons.

Again , I can argue that you can do anything with enough votes in our government . If there’s enough eggheads out there groupies together to make nuclear material readily available to the public it can happen . I say eggheads because we don’t have to worry about bubbas wanting to play with atomic atom splitting .

 

[ClearwaterVol]

And they are correct, you cannot use a right guaranteed by the constitution to harm others. Any other position is asinine.

Again, you have an opinion. Unfortunately, even the most strident supporters of the 2A on the Court have disagreed with you for decades.

 

[1972 Grad]

yes any American that can afford a nuclear weapon should be able to have one.

How much are they going for these days....cash?

 

[C-south]

If banks and stock exchange aren't open, then it has to be a holiday. Those guys only close when they have to close.

I’ll give you stock exchange but banks close for every mundane “holiday” imaginable.

 

[Rickyvol77]

It is well behaved white supremacists.

white supremacists? LOL trope away

 

[0nelilreb]

I always f@#k that one up.

So do I , ive just been lucky and caught myself lately

 

[C-south]

I always f@#k that one up.

You two?

 

[ClearwaterVol]

Again , I can argue that you can do anything with enough votes in our government . If there’s enough eggheads out there groupies together to make nuclear material readily available to the public it can happen . I say eggheads because we don’t have to worry about bubbas wanting to play with atomic atom splitting .

Why would they have to split anything? It should be unconstitutional for the government to control these arms in a manner that is designed to keep them out of the hands of the citizens.

 

[Rickyvol77]

non-sequitur.

The 2A was written at a time when the word arms did not include weapons that could destroy the world. Therefore, I think a reasonable interpretation would be to place certain "arms" outside of the rights granted under 2A. Hence my comment about limits.

"weapons that could destroy the world" lmao....what a pansy

 

[1972 Grad]

I always f@#k that one up.

The simplest way, but not 100% sure, is affect is usually used as a verb, and effect is usually used as a noun. Something affects you, or has an effect on you.

 

[0nelilreb]

Why would they have to split anything? It should be unconstitutional for the government to control these arms in a manner that is designed to keep them out of the hands of the citizens.

Same with fully automatic weapons , but slick Willy was able to get enough votes to make that happen . Again we can make Trump king for life with enough votes .

 

[hog88]

Again, you have an opinion. Unfortunately, even the most strident supporters of the 2A on the Court have disagreed with you for decades.

SCOTUS as a whole has mad many terrible and incorrect decisions throughout our history and many individual judges have had wholly unconstitutional positions.

 

[USAFgolferVol]

But the supreme court disagrees with you. But you and other libs love to leave that out.

I'm a supporter of the 2A. And unlike you, a patriot

 

[Rickyvol77]

How does that effect the intent and effect of 1A. I'd say the difference in a musket and nuclear weapon makes your comparison a little off the mark.

a nuclear weapon isn't a firearm

 

[USAFgolferVol]

Nothing scares you all on the far left like a black person who is conservative

There you are again, showing off that enormous brain power.

 

[Rickyvol77]

Do explain? If 2A is limitless then my argument should be easy to defend by simply saying, "Yes, I believe that all Americans should be able to own a nuclear device of their own."

it covers firearms genius, that is not an explosive, let me guess, educated in a public school?