hog88
Your ray of sunshine
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2008
- Messages
- 114,568
- Likes
- 162,768
You mean because head neck al-Qaeda got caught by the FBI planning to launch an attack on the capital during the rally??? “DEAR GOD I CAN ONLY BUY ONE GUN A MONTH!!!! THE HUMANITY!!!” If you are bulking buying ammo and guns you need to be paid a visit by the FBI‘s JTF and ATF.
You mean because head neck al-Qaeda got caught by the FBI planning to launch an attack on the capital during the rally??? “DEAR GOD I CAN ONLY BUY ONE GUN A MONTH!!!! THE HUMANITY!!!” If you are bulking buying ammo and guns you need to be paid a visit by the FBI‘s JTF and ATF.
A computer could have scripted the bulk of this thread.
The two most populated sides need to step away from their fears and biases if we are to move forward. Find a place of stability between the two. Work from there.
I agree about the dog. Should require a lawful warrant which requires PC.I think a stop where an individual has to remain detained for ANY length of time for a dog to fetched and sniff their person or car is unreasonable. The individual is being detained without probable to allow a government agent to obtain probable cause. Cart before horse and unconstitutional in my mind. Furthermore, it has been shown that the handler can get have the dog indicate the presence of contraband without it being there.
Most judges agree with my views on the 2A, so I am alright with the company I keep.
A computer could have scripted the bulk of this thread.
The two most populated sides need to step away from their fears and biases if we are to move forward. Find a place of stability between the two. Work from there.
There’s a show on A&E now that is a police dog competition. There’s a part where they search a course for drug scented objects. It’s kind of comical how many times they hit on the wrong item.And generally speaking, I agree with it.
I have always hated the Patriot Act. I hated Bloomberg's "stop and frisk." I think dog sniffs are a search.
Serious question , how do you find common ground with one group that wants to take another’s group constitutional rights away when that side has nothing to offer but “ it’s the right thing to do “ ? In any compromise, by definition there must be give and take for a common solution to be reached . I hear a lot of one sided taking but no giving .
No it’s exactly what hog told you it was and if we’re happy with our rights as they are now why in the hell would we compromise to relinquish them? That’s just stupid. There are already too many unconstitutional limitations on the ownership of firearms. NFA1934 and GCA1968 should be immediately repealed and this BS tax stamp control means should be abolished ASAP.It's a religion, then, on the right as well.
I have yet to hear anyone here of the Pro-2A hardline be able to properly articulate the stance under which the de-escalationists are operating. In order to fully understand one's position, one must also grasp and respect the arguments of other side.
The contempt for "other" is a weakness, not a strength,
No it’s exactly what hog told you it was and if we’re happy with our rights as they are now why in the hell would we compromise to relinquish them? That’s just stupid. There are already too many unconstitutional limitations on the ownership of firearms. NFA1934 and GCA1968 should be immediately repealed and this BS tax stamp control means should be abolished ASAP.
No you’re just not listening. The pro 2A aren’t interested in “negotiating” any more rights away. The only thing I’m interested in is repealing most legislation already in place.I have yet to hear anyone here of the Pro-2A hardline be able to properly articulate the stance under which the de-escalationists are operating. In order to fully understand one's position, one must also grasp and respect the arguments of other side.
The contempt for "other" is a weakness, not a strength,