InVOLuntary
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 59,868
- Likes
- 139,135
You'll think militia if he opens up on you with that. You will find out that there is no such thing as cover.
I wonder if we started with freedom of speech? We could say that no one could speak about liberal ideology as a starting point. Then we could negotiate in the middle by saying we could approve certain issues and only discuss them on certain days and only in certain locations. That would be a compromise.You might have a point for those on the anti-gun side but on the 2A side it's about rights and you do NOT compromise on enumerated rights.
And I've yet to see a liberal that wants to circumvent the Constitution come up with one logical reason for circumventing.I have yet to hear anyone here of the Pro-2A hardline be able to properly articulate the stance under which the de-escalationists are operating. In order to fully understand one's position, one must also grasp and respect the arguments of other side.
The contempt for "other" is a weakness, not a strength,
I wonder if we started with freedom of speech? We could say that no one could speak about liberal ideology as a starting point. Then we could negotiate in the middle by saying we could approve certain issues and only discuss them on certain days and only in certain locations. That would be a compromise.
Let's start here, then. What is the primary reason why a majority of Virginians voted for their representatives to address gun proliferation? Safety. They were using the ballot to say that they were increasingly feeling unsafe around individuals and groups that increasingly use weaponry as the primary motivator to solve problems or establish dominance.