VN's very own political meme thread...

[Orangeslice13]

I fact checked this and didn’t find any evidence of an attempted lynching

 

[Septic]

I fact checked this and didn’t find any evidence of an attempted lynching

Capitol Police: 1
Insurrectionist Hillbilly's: 0

 

[Orangeslice13]

Capitol Police: 1
Insurrectionist Hillbilly's: 0

Please keep up with the topic.

-Main posted a meme that wasn’t 100% accurate
-Someone called him on it.
-He manned up and said he should have checked it
-I said he doesn’t have too as nobody expected accuracy in memes
-he then posted another meme that’s intentionally inaccurate
-which brings us to my joke .....

that everyone got except you.

 

[Septic]

Please keep up with the topic.

-Main posted a meme that wasn’t 100% accurate
-Someone called him on it.
-He manned up and said he should have checked it
-I said he doesn’t have too as nobody expected accuracy in memes
-he then posted another meme that’s intentionally inaccurate
-which brings us to my joke .....

that everyone got except you.

Calm down, I wasn't attacking you.

Why so hostile?

 

[Orangeslice13]

Calm down, I wasn't attacking you.

Why so hostile?

Honestly with the “He mad” again?
Nobody is mad or hostile. I’m trying to help you because you used to be one of my favorite posters. Right up there with McDad. But Lately you’ve been off. Way off. Like send you down to the minors to get it together, off.
Get you **** together man.

 

[Septic]

Honestly with the “He mad” again?
Nobody is mad or hostile. I’m trying to help you because you used to be one of my favorite posters. Right up there with McDad. But Lately you’ve been off. Way off. Like send you down to the minors to get it together, off.
Get you **** together man.

Seriously? I appreciate your concern, but it's you who's been lashing out at the drop of a hat, as was the case here. Noting your overt hostility wasn't and isn't mocking your response, no need to be so defensive.

Again, I wasn't attacking you.

Perhaps I simply misjudged your response and 'unnecessarily rude' would have been more of an apt descriptor - but that's not been you m.o., until now?

 

[SlingBlayde]

 

[SlingBlayde]

 

[Vol Main]

I fact checked this and didn’t find any evidence of an attempted lynching

“'Hang Mike Pence!' the insurrectionists chanted as they pressed inside, beating police with pipes."
'Hang Mike Pence!': Assault on U.S. Capitol a more sinister attack than first appeared

 

[FrankenVol54]

Yeah maybe, but you're a curmudgeon who's opinion on humor is less than worthless.

You probably wear masks in the shower.

 

[DancingOutlaw]

“'Hang Mike Pence!' the insurrectionists chanted as they pressed inside, beating police with pipes."
'Hang Mike Pence!': Assault on U.S. Capitol a more sinister attack than first appeared

Why wouldn't the gun nuts just shoot him?
Oh right they were going to take over the government with no weapons. I keep forgetting.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Seriously? I appreciate your concern, but it's you who's been lashing out at the drop of a hat, as was the case here. Noting your overt hostility wasn't and isn't mocking your response, no need to be so defensive.

Again, I wasn't attacking you.

Perhaps I simply misjudged your response and 'unnecessarily rude' would have been more of an apt descriptor - but that's not been you m.o., until now?

 

[Orangeslice13]

View attachment 356080

 

[Orangeslice13]

“'Hang Mike Pence!' the insurrectionists chanted as they pressed inside, beating police with pipes."
'Hang Mike Pence!': Assault on U.S. Capitol a more sinister attack than first appeared

This is very poor fact checking.
The meme says Trump has only tried to lynch Pence once. The dipsticks that follow Trump are actually not Trump. I’m not sure you knew that

 

[Vol Main]

 

[Vol Main]

This is very poor fact checking.
The meme says Trump has only tried to lynch Pence once. The dipsticks that follow Trump are actually not Trump. I’m not sure you knew that

If you read my posts for the purpose of misunderstanding them in order to post some objection, instead of reading for the purpose of understanding, please put me on filter.

 

[Orangeslice13]

If you read my posts for the purpose of misunderstanding them in order to post some objection, instead of reading for the purpose of understanding, please put me on filter.

Oh
You know how much I enjoy mental algebra.
This should be fun.
Does this apply to all threads or just here?

 

[Vol Main]

Oh
You know how much I enjoy mental algebra.
This should be fun.
Does this apply to all threads or just here?

Actually, I don't know that. The purpose of writing is to communicate. The purpose of reading should be first to understand what the writer is saying or trying to say. At some point, discussions include more details which of course involve questions. But first, you work with whatever value is there. Unless the post has no value to discuss or is simply wrong, the value in a post should come first. That is just me and my circle of friends in my personal life. I realize that several one of the members here like to post destructive interference in their replies.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Actually, I don't know that. The purpose of writing is to communicate. The purpose of reading should be first to understand what the writer is saying or trying to say. At some point, discussions include more details which of course involve questions. But first, you work with whatever value is there. Unless the post has no value to discuss or is simply wrong, the value in a post should come first. That is just me and my circle of friends in my personal life. I realize that several one of the members here like to post destructive interference in their replies.

My involvement varies with content and context.
For example on the Luther scale I’d put my serious response level at approximately 23% leaving 91.5% in the “joking” or “being an ass” category. While functioning in either category it’s possible that I a) understood you clearly B) didn’t understand your point C) clearly understood but chose to like like I didn’t for effect or D) didn’t understand but thought I did but acted as if I didn’t understand for effects and there actually responded as if I did. It’s up to you to determine which is happening. If that’s to much work you can always chose to pretend I don’t exist. @lawgator1 is pretty good at this most of the time.

that’s just how Jewish Rednecks roll.

 

[Grand Vol]

Seriously? I appreciate your concern, but it's you who's been lashing out at the drop of a hat, as was the case here. Noting your overt hostility wasn't and isn't mocking your response, no need to be so defensive.

Again, I wasn't attacking you.

Perhaps I simply misjudged your response and 'unnecessarily rude' would have been more of an apt descriptor - but that's not been you m.o., until now?

You have been way off lately.

Maybe Slice is right. Some time in the AAA league would help.

 

[Ernest T. Vol]

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Should have called them in for these too, but didn't.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Capitol Police: 1
Insurrectionist Hillbilly's: 0

-10 for incorrect use of an apostrophe

 

[lawgator1]

My involvement varies with content and context.
For example on the Luther scale I’d put my serious response level at approximately 23% leaving 91.5% in the “joking” or “being an ass” category. While functioning in either category it’s possible that I a) understood you clearly B) didn’t understand your point C) clearly understood but chose to like like I didn’t for effect or D) didn’t understand but thought I did but acted as if I didn’t understand for effects and there actually responded as if I did. It’s up to you to determine which is happening. If that’s to much work you can always chose to pretend I don’t exist. @lawgator1 is pretty good at this most of the time.

that’s just how Jewish Rednecks roll.

I ignored this.

 

[LouderVol]

.