n_huffhines
What's it gonna cost?
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 88,710
- Likes
- 53,624
So is your issue that without IS support Ukraine can't defend themselves?It's confounding to me that people think you're not peaceful if you think you should fight to defend territory that belongs to you. It's one of the most disengenuous, and completely hypocritical positions by the right. If people called you a war-monger because you weren't giving up Texas to strike a peace deal with an invading Mexico who you can't even trust to keep the bad deal, you would think they were stupid as hell. That's how y'all look.
He is welcome to fight his unwinnable war. What is hypocritical about that statement?It's confounding to me that people think you're not peaceful if you think you should fight to defend territory that belongs to you. It's one of the most disengenuous, and completely hypocritical positions by the right. If people called you a war-monger because you weren't giving up Texas to strike a peace deal with an invading Mexico who you can't even trust to keep the bad deal, you would think they were stupid as hell. That's how y'all look.
He is welcome to fight his unwinnable war. What is hypocritical about that statement?
He is not welcome to tell us that we have to support his unwinnable war, publicly destroy any chance of negotiating and end, and demand that the US promise to go into military conflict with a nuclear superpower, as long as he refuses to negotiate an end to the war.
What is hypocritical about any of that?