Billy Antrim
aka The Kid
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2009
- Messages
- 4,813
- Likes
- 6,157
Iron I thought you were a Memphis fan now? Ppl are on you bc you took it a little overboard with the Pro-Bo stuff. To some it appears pitiful.Glad to know you guys are keeping up with me!
Hey to all recruiting gurus I have a question. On Rivals we are ranked 11 which is pretty good and on our way to top 10 but Scout has us at 21! I know each service has their own guys and make their own evaluations but 10 spots? Thats crazy! I would assume there would be some difference in scout, rivals, espn etc but I figure a spot or two different with each service but how do you get a difference of 10? Thats a pretty big gap. Any thoughts?
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I've always felt that Rivals is just all around better at college football recruiting...
The reason for such a huge disparity is that Scout's point system favors quantity over quality whereas Rivals does the opposite...
A good example is Miami...they have 3 four star recruits and no top 100 players according to Scout...we have 8 four stars and 4 top 100 players...but Miami is ahead of us because they have 9 more commits than us...
What is more important...how many bodies you bring in or how high quality those bodies are and how well they fill your needs?
I personally believe it's quality that's important and that's why I prefer Rivals and barely even pay attention to Scout