Adam Sandler
No Colonel Sanders, you’re wrong!
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 10,724
- Likes
- 26,824
This college kids see video games as the gospel. Try to convince them video games don’t matter. There are teenagers making millions of dollars playing video games. That is the reality we live in.
My knee jerk reaction here was we are about 3 spots low...but, knowing that basically Nico and the offense is still a relative unknown and the Secondary is going to be beat up, then 7 isn't all that far off.
I would still have us ahead of LSU and maybe even Mizzou.
We went 8-4 with Joe at qb last year and injuries at receiver. Barring nico getting hurt I see the floor as 9-3 with this team. Schedule sets up nicely this year compared to last year as well. Although I do wish we played mizzou this year after drinkwitz little comment to heupel after the game. After us putting 56 on their head two years in a row. He gets a win and knows he don't have to play us the next year and acts like he's some hot shot.My knee jerk reaction here was we are about 3 spots low...but, knowing that basically Nico and the offense is still a relative unknown and the Secondary is going to be beat up, then 7 isn't all that far off.
I would still have us ahead of LSU and maybe even Mizzou.
We went 8-4 with Joe at qb last year and injuries at receiver. Barring nico getting hurt I see the floor as 9-3 with this team. Schedule sets up nicely this year compared to last year as well. Although I do wish we played mizzou this year after drinkwitz little comment to heupel after the game. After us putting 56 on their head two years in a row. He gets a win and knows he don't have to play us the next year and acts like he's some hot shot.
They’re not a bad team, and it’s a legitimate question. How well their oline performs could easily be the difference between 9-3 and 5-7
This is not a league where your offensive and defensive lines can be suspect and you still be successful. You’re not in the BIG12 anymore.@vol_in_ga, do you really think a 5-7 record for Oklahoma is easily within reason for 2024?
That would mean that a team Phil Steele has listed as 7 in his strength/power poll loses 7 of 8 conference games -- do you think that's a realistic possibility?
I heard Houston is expected to make a surprising amount of noise for its first year in the Power 4. Don't know if that's true, just heard it on one of the Josh Pate analysis videos.This is not a league where your offensive and defensive lines can be suspect and you still be successful. You’re not in the BIG12 anymore.
On3 expert thinks this unit will be the reason Oklahoma sinks or swims
Does Bill Bedenbaugh’s offensive line have enough to get the job done in the SEC?soonerswire.usatoday.com
View attachment 660942
OU went 10-3 in the Big 12 with a heisman candidate at qb. Is OU expecting to be better than last year? I can’t imagine so after all the losses they had at various positions.
I see 5 expected wins in temple, Houston, tulane, South Carolina, and Maine (and OU would be wise not to underestimate Tulane or a desperate South Carolina). The rest could easily be losses. I don’t see this schedule without at least 3 losses from Texas, Bama, lsu, ole miss, Tennessee, and mizzou. Going .500 there should be considered a successful first season in the SEC. So yes, I could easily see OU at 9-3 with an 5-0 start and just as easily see 5-7 losing all SEC games other than South Carolina. Games against Tennessee at home and at Auburn will be good barometers for setting the rest of the seasons expectations going into the bye week.
This is not a league where your offensive and defensive lines can be suspect and you still be successful. You’re not in the BIG12 anymore.
On3 expert thinks this unit will be the reason Oklahoma sinks or swims
Does Bill Bedenbaugh’s offensive line have enough to get the job done in the SEC?soonerswire.usatoday.com
View attachment 660942
OU went 10-3 in the Big 12 with a heisman candidate at qb. Is OU expecting to be better than last year? I can’t imagine so after all the losses they had at various positions.
I see 5 expected wins in temple, Houston, tulane, South Carolina, and Maine (and OU would be wise not to underestimate Tulane or a desperate South Carolina). The rest could easily be losses. I don’t see this schedule without at least 3 losses from Texas, Bama, lsu, ole miss, Tennessee, and mizzou. Going .500 there should be considered a successful first season in the SEC. So yes, I could easily see OU at 9-3 with an 5-0 start and just as easily see 5-7 losing all SEC games other than South Carolina. Games against Tennessee at home and at Auburn will be good barometers for setting the rest of the seasons expectations going into the bye week.
I don't think OU goes 5-7 but the lack of OL depth is cause for concern. The defense could be really good and that will win some games. 7-5 should be the floor I think.Okay. We'll see.
BTW, the On3 expert that you cite said that Oklahoma might struggle to a 7-5 season this year. There was no mention of 5-7.
Every Sooner fan I know is anxious for this season to start. Serious predictions of a possible 5-7 record make it even more interesting. We'll see soon enough whether Oklahoma falls to below .500 in the SEC.
The link was just for the focus on the offensive line (and it says apparently defensive - which would surprise me with a defensive background head coach), which I see as OUs biggest question mark.Okay. We'll see.
BTW, the On3 expert that you cite said that Oklahoma might struggle to a 7-5 season this year. There was no mention of 5-7.
Every Sooner fan I know is anxious for this season to start. Serious predictions of a possible 5-7 record make it even more interesting. We'll see soon enough whether Oklahoma falls to below .500 in the SEC.