Vols should still be a one seed.

#27
#27
I think that TN fans need to worry about which 7/10 they’re looking at well before a regional final versus a #1 seed. And which 3/6/11/14 or however the math works on an EE showdown. I’ll give a pass on the first round #15. The bottom of the brackets are filling up with bad teams.
True, but one thing is certain. This year's cinderella is among them.
 
#30
#30
Compared to the cfp committee, I would say we def have a higher chance because the criteria is more defined in college basketball. Neither Arizona or North Carolina won their conference tourney so we still have a shot.
We lost to NC so if it's between Vols or them, NC should get the nod. But....I'm more concerned about our team showing up ready to play like they are capable.
 
Last edited:
#31
#31
Perhaps we’re deserving, but it ain’t happening.
Actually I don't think they are good enough for a one OR two seed. Inside play is too soft and wings are not good enough shooters ( "K" not included as he is to me a rover not a wing per say) and one good guard (sorta small) just can't do it all. Good team that just isn't top of the heap.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfeeva
#33
#33
There is no way Tennessee gets a 1 seed. None. Zero. Tennessee losing to Kentucky started to close the door, and the Mississippi State loss slammed it shut. The four 1 seeds are UConn, Purdue, Houston, and UNC. You can take it to the bank.

Even had UNC lost before the finals, they were already ahead of Tennessee. The sudden change in media articles praising UNC last week showed the committee's hand early. The only thing Vol fans should worry about now is which #1 seed they're going to be paired against, and how they intend to get there to play them.
Agree on UNC…they at least advanced to conf tourney finals. We lose our last 2 games and lost to UNC. Hate it but we gave up our leverage the last 2 games.
 
#34
#34
It's certainly a possibility, but there was an interview with the committee last week where they said that the #1 line had more or less been decided before tournament weekend. Maybe that means they were going with Iowa State, or perhaps they meant they had decided how they would seed based on outcomes, and had nothing left to discuss. I suppose any of those things are possible.

I admit I am a bit biased after 2022, when winning the SEC Tournament did absolutely nothing to improve Tennessee's seeding. I suppose if I saw Iowa State get a bump to the 1 line for winning their tournament this year, I would get ... a little ... bit salty ... about it ... so I'm probably predisposed to think "you better not reward them."
I hadn’t seen that, but if the committee chair really said the #1 seeds had been decided prior to tournament weekend, don’t be surprised if we’re one of them.
 
#35
#35
Not a chance, lucky to hang onto a 2 seed.
Not lucky at all to hang onto a 2 seed. The carnage in college basketball the last three days shows just how vulnerable every program is. Our overall body of work and difficult schedule pretty much assures us of a 2.

Disclaimer: It’s the NCAA and the tournament committee, and as such, anything is possible.
 
#36
#36
If that really happens then all the stuff about the NCAA not caring about conference tournament championship games is hog wash.
The stuff about them not caring about conference tournaments is BS. Wisconsin and Illinois have both improved their seed in the last three days, as an example. Lunardi now has Illinois as a 3 and Wisconsin a 5 in the latest projections.
 
#37
#37
We lost to NC so if it's between Vols or them, NC should get the nod. But....I'm more concerned about our team showing up ready to play like they are capable.
Agreed, a lot of concern over our seeding when it won't matter much if we play like we did with Ky and MSU. Plus, if you're a #1 seed and get bounced early it looks worse than being bounced as lower seeding.
 
#39
#39
Great effort selling your perspective, but don’t be shocked if Iowa St snags that last top line spot.
UNC had the #1 locked after TN loss to State and UNC made it to the semis. It’s not the TN loss but how they lost, imo, as TN was never in the game.

Iowa State will be on the two seed line.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Squaret
#40
#40
I don't like the inconsistency of all this - one year a tournament win is not important - the next year it is.

I feel the committee is only looking for any way possible to keep an ACC team as one of the number 1 seeds. I have full confidence that the committee is going to put Tennessee in a spot where there is a higher possibility that they lose. Bama was the SEC darling and Tennessee blew that for them.
 
#44
#44
The stuff about them not caring about conference tournaments is BS. Wisconsin and Illinois have both improved their seed in the last three days, as an example. Lunardi now has Illinois as a 3 and Wisconsin a 5 in the latest projections.
I think people are confusing the Sunday games not mattering much for conference tournaments not mattering. By the time we get to Selection Sunday the committee is down to 2-3 scenarios based on the few games today. Seeds are locked at this point, the only question is if any potential automatic qualifiers might force a change or two.
 
#45
#45
Despite losing in the first round of the SEC tourney, the team is still deserving of a one seed. They won the toughest conference in basketball this year and had to win 3/4 against top 25 teams to win the league.
I think the 2nd 2 seed now. Iowa st should get 4th 1 seed. Then UNC now a 2 with us right behind.
 
#47
#47
It’s not the loss itself that’s an issue, it’s how they lost, and that goes for UK game. The offense has been putrid, defensive lapses and looks of disinterest in being out there period.
The loss to MSU was bad but UK was just unconscious on fire from 3 in our game. If they could bottle up hitting 50% from 3 vs the field, they'd win it all. We didn't have a bad O game vs them.
 
#48
#48
Guys…. Iowa State is not getting a 1-seed. You can have your opinion and it will be respected but they are absolutely NOT getting a 1-seed. And neither are we. The top 8 teams will be:

1. UConn
2. Purdue
3. Houston
4. UNC

5. Tennessee/Iowa State
6. Iowa State/Tennessee
7. Arizona
8. Marquette

The 2-seeds may change a little in order but those will be the top 8 teams. I don’t see how the 2-seed line involves any other teams and none of these are jumping up to a 1-seed
 
#49
#49
Guys…. Iowa State is not getting a 1-seed. You can have your opinion and it will be respected but they are absolutely NOT getting a 1-seed. And neither are we. The top 8 teams will be:

1. UConn
2. Purdue
3. Houston
4. UNC

5. Tennessee/Iowa State
6. Iowa State/Tennessee
7. Arizona
8. Marquette

The 2-seeds may change a little in order but those will be the top 8 teams. I don’t see how the 2-seed line involves any other teams and none of these are jumping up to a 1-seed
I agree, but it’s only out of pure cynicism for the committee and their process.

These résumé’s aren’t that close, IMO:

NC - Best 10 Wins and all Losses (NET):
W- 6, 10, 10, 35, 40, 40, 46, 54, 60, 63
L- 2, 19, 35, 41, 63, 84, 127

Iowa State
W- 1, 1, 12, 14, 20, 28, 30, 37, 42, 42
L- 1, 12, 14, 45, 46, 60, 71
 
#50
#50
Guys…. Iowa State is not getting a 1-seed. You can have your opinion and it will be respected but they are absolutely NOT getting a 1-seed. And neither are we. The top 8 teams will be:

1. UConn
2. Purdue
3. Houston
4. UNC

5. Tennessee/Iowa State
6. Iowa State/Tennessee
7. Arizona
8. Marquette

The 2-seeds may change a little in order but those will be the top 8 teams. I don’t see how the 2-seed line involves any other teams and none of these are jumping up to a 1-seed
Jerry Palm at CBS now has Iowa State as a ONE seed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmy Football

VN Store



Back
Top