And anyone else who uses a teleprompter when it malfunctions.
Again, duh....sigh, not everyone.
Bill Clinton once gave gave half of a 45 minute speech from memory when a teleprompter failed on him. When it finally came back on line, Clinton didn't miss a beat and the crowd never knew there was a problem. (this is the recollection of Dick Morris)
I'm no fan of Bill Clinton's, but I believe he could run intellectual circles around Obama.
Honestly, were you expecting anything different?
I know you're trying to condemnthe site as one littered with political simpletons, but don't bother. There just aren't enough uneducated and lazy posters willing ti venture into this part of te site to make it seem that America is somehow liberal or in dire need of governmental solutions to mass stupidity.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
On the contrary. I'm just saying that on balance, this forum leans to the right. I personally think there are some extremely bright and informed posters here.
However, if you don't think this forum has its share of political simpletons from both sides, you're nuts.
One does not need to be leaning either way to decide that Obama is unqualified for his job. The man has thus far lived up to every fear we could have had about him and has failed to do anything GE said he would on the campaign trail, save some of the worthless, ultraliberal or trivial promises.On the contrary. I'm just saying that on balance, this forum leans to the right. I personally think there are some extremely bright and informed posters here.
However, if you don't think this forum has its share of political simpletons from both sides, you're nuts.
"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday shows that 31% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-three percent (33%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -2. That matches the lowest level yet recorded"
Rasmussen Reports: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere
VolDad, thanks for the updated link.I am seeing a trend here:
"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Thursday shows that 30% of the nation's voters now Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-eight percent (38%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of 8."
Rasmussen Reports: The Most Comprehensive Public Opinion Data Anywhere
Not one person who voted great, can qualify their vote with a single reason or fact.
Absolutely pathetic. :jpshakehead:
I don't NEED an explanation. You would think someone who thinks that racist bastard is doing a GREAT job, would be proud to step up and say it.TBH I think it's kind of pathetic you would need an explanation. No offense. Why would a right winger who voted terrible need to explain themselves? They shouldn't. I think it's quite obvious why people have voted the way they have. I'm not trying to be mean honestly, it's just not that hard.
I don't NEED an explanation. You would think someone who thinks that racist bastard is doing a GREAT job, would be proud to step up and say it.
A large group who voted terrible, were not afraid to say it. Most also listed their reasons.
The poll was fair and unbiased. The Obama supporters got their ass handed to them. It's called, trying to slip away unnoticed. Perhaps you see 'spineless' as a good character trait.
That's EXACTLY what you are doing, trolling for a fight.I don't think it's spineless as you so "eloquently" put it. It's more pointless. I think it's quite obvious that the people who voted that he's doing great voted so because they are liberal or agree with the agenda that he is putting forth. The people who voted terrible are conservatives and/or moderates that don't like his agenda. So, that's pretty easy to see. It's pointless to argue over opinion when it's so painfully obvious that no ones opinion would change in a debate, especially here, anyways. And who really and truly cares if the Obama supporters "got their ass handed to them?" This isn't a scientific poll, nor is it a geographically balanced poll. Anyone that knows anything about political socialization even in a basic form could have understood how this poll was going to balance out before it was even made. So quit trolling for a fight just so you can get in a dick measuring contest about why your opinions are "better" than someone elses.
all that said, I'd love to hear from folks like truefan and TennNC. they were Obama apologists even before the election.
I don't think it's spineless as you so "eloquently" put it. It's more pointless. I think it's quite obvious that the people who voted that he's doing great voted so because they are liberal or agree with the agenda that he is putting forth. The people who voted terrible are conservatives and/or moderates that don't like his agenda. So, that's pretty easy to see. It's pointless to argue over opinion when it's so painfully obvious that no ones opinion would change in a debate, especially here, anyways. And who really and truly cares if the Obama supporters "got their ass handed to them?" This isn't a scientific poll, nor is it a geographically balanced poll. Anyone that knows anything about political socialization even in a basic form could have understood how this poll was going to balance out before it was even made. So quit trolling for a fight just so you can get in a dick measuring contest about why your opinions are "better" than someone elses.
No, I'm not. I even said so in my first post. You're the one that bumped this thread trolling so you could get in an argument over it.That's EXACTLY what you are doing, trolling for a fight.
And for as many reasons you could give why he's been detrimental to America, I'm guessing a liberal could list just as many, if not the same reasons as to why he's doing a great job.I want to know what Obama is doing that I'm missing. I would love to hear someone explain how he is benefiting this nation. I could list a hundred reasons why he is detrimental to America. It's called debate.
No. I would gladly go back and vote that though just to piss off you and joevol though.Let me take a stab in the dark. You voted great, didn't you?
So again remind us what he has done to warrant anything north of atrocious?
Economic disaster
international affairs disaster
beating down the military soon to help fund his economic disaster
his Mai agenda is social and economic justice, which is pathetic as a presidential mission.
Posted via VolNation Mobile