'20 WA OLB Sav'ell Smalls

#116
#116
WhatInVolnation said:
If Pruitt and Co. can pull off Bailey, Hardy, Baron, Thomas, and Oxendine and maybe Rybka at DL and Smalls, Ojulari, Sewell, Grimes, and Eason at LB in the ‘20 class, we are laying the groundwork to be nasty ‘21 forward.
Click to expand...

Well that would be 10-11 players out of a 25 person class and wouldn’t include the 3-4 DBs that we need. Otherwise it would be a solid class.
 
#119
#119
Woodlawn VOL said:
Not saying we land him, but probably a better chance than many think right now. It will be a hard pull from out west but I think his interest in Tennessee is genuine. JMHO! GBO!
Click to expand...

Exactly. Seems like every time anyone shows some positivity towards a recruit, someone always has to come in and be Johnny Raincloud.

The fact that we are getting a visit from Smalls and he speaks highly of Pruitt is reason enough to. Be excited.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Woodlawn VOL, DiderotsGhost, CreiveHallVol and 2 others
#122
#122
sonofUT62 said:
That’s not my point. The point is that would be 14-15 defensive players, + a long snapper in a class of 24-25. That’s not feasible.
Click to expand...

So what is your point? We still have Bailey Calloway mays spraggins and Tee committed on the offensive side of the ball... I’m just curious why are you purposely trying to make it seem like if we got the players he named we would not have an excellent class.
 
#123
#123
BoroVol93 said:
So what is your point? We still have Bailey Calloway mays spraggins and Tee committed on the offensive side of the ball... I’m just curious why are you purposely trying to make it seem like if we got the players he named we would not have an excellent class.
Click to expand...

I just told you EXACTLY word for word what my point was. But I’ll pretend this time like I’m talking to my kid...... if we take the 10-11 front seven players that he named plus 3-4 DBs, plus the long snapper that will put us at 15-16 defensive players in a class of 24-25. If we then take 4 OL lineman, that will leave us 4-5 total spots for TEs, WRs, QBs and Running backs, in a class where we may be trying to use 5 spots just at QB and WR. That’s not feasible. Any questions or have I dumbed it down enough for you??
 
#124
#124
sonofUT62 said:
I just told you EXACTLY word for word what my point was. But I’ll pretend this time like I’m talking to my kid...... if we take the 10-11 front seven players that he named plus 3-4 DBs, plus the long snapper that will put us at 15-16 defensive players in a class of 24-25. If we then take 4 OL lineman, that will leave us 4-5 total spots for TEs, WRs, QBs and Running backs, in a class where we may be trying to use 5 spots just at QB and WR. That’s not feasible. Any questions or have I dumbed it down enough for you??
Click to expand...

But_why_male_models.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glitch
#125
#125
sonofUT62 said:
I just told you EXACTLY word for word what my point was. But I’ll pretend this time like I’m talking to my kid...... if we take the 10-11 front seven players that he named plus 3-4 DBs, plus the long snapper that will put us at 15-16 defensive players in a class of 24-25. If we then take 4 OL lineman, that will leave us 4-5 total spots for TEs, WRs, QBs and Running backs, in a class where we may be trying to use 5 spots just at QB and WR. That’s not feasible. Any questions or have I dumbed it down enough for you??
Click to expand...

Lol nope I think I need it a tad bit dumber... good point though I’m sure we won’t get all the players mentioned but if we somehow did I wouldn’t mind missing on a few offensive players that defense would be so nasty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billy Antrim
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top