Yeah, I would. I am not a fan of hiring anyone without any college coaching experience, with VERY few exceptions. The NBA/GLeague/Euro ball and college basketball are similar only in the fact that they put a round ball inside a larger round hole.
Additionally, I don't think Tennessee needs to be the school taking the chance in breaking the gender barrier. There is so much risk in that if she fails. It could set the program back a decade, or more. The idea of Pat Summitt taking over 20 years ago seemed slightly less outrageous following the consecutive stints of Wade Houston and Kevin O'Neill, and our program basically being an afterthought. Summitt also had significantly more name recognition and clout than Kara Lawson. She was the Phil Jackson of women's basketball and also knew what it took, as a coach of the most successful women's program in history, to succeed in the world of recruiting and on the court in the college game.
Right now, Tennessee basketball is potentially entering into a period of unparalleled success. We have the right coach, and he's recruited the right players to take us to a level of sustained success that we have probably only seen one other time in our history. If he retires in 5 years, what would be the motivating force behind taking perhaps the single largest coaching hire gamble in the history of American sports? We don't need to do that, we shouldn't do that, and Kara Lawson can't hardly do enough in the next 5 years to change things enough to convince me otherwise. This isn't me being sexist. This is me weighing the risk vs reward, and in this case, the risk heavily outweighs the reward.