NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,198
- Likes
- 83,313
Huh?? The US has been warmongering all over Latin America, The Middle East and East Asia since 1945. Africa was spared with only dealing with overthrow of Patrice Lumumba, Libya/Khaddafi and Somalia.Being serious a moment the world and Europe changed forever as the rules based order that kept the peace since 1945 was swept away by an aging dictator exactly a year ago right now. Praying 2023 will bring victory.
Of course Ukraine needed weapons. It's the fact that they are asking for China, Iran, and North Korea for assistance makes them laughable and beyond second rate. Quick question about this situation: Would y ok say Russia is on schedule, ahead of schedule, behind schedule, or grossly laughably absurdly behind in this "military operation." The answer to this tells you all you need to know.
WTF is NATO going to do? They're already running out of weapons. You really think the US is going to go any further for the Poles than they have for the Ukrainians?
If the bald dwarf had taken Kyiv in the time table he expected western weaponry wouldn't have mattered. Alas, the bald dwarf failed to realize how ****** his military is. Sucks to be him.Yes. I was wrong on Ukraine being close to folding last summer due to underestimating the lengths the West would go to prop them up and keep them fighting. Also was wrong on them being able to conduct successful offensives which they did in Kharkov.
I think you meant 362 days behind schedule.Nice attempt to dodge, but it isnt that easy. The West has been claiming for 6 months that Russia has been begging for weapons yet Russia continues a high rate of bombardment to this day. You might want to consider that when regurgitating that idiotic talking point.
I would say Russia is on their schedule. War never goes as anticipated. Russia made some miscalculations (as did Ukraine/the West). That is just part of it. Russia seems to have adapted better than Ukraine and is in a much better position currently.
You’ve offered plenty of **** Russian media to help us get out laughs in while we can. That was another directive from you Moe. And the laughs have been oh so plentifulHave I needed to source Russia Today often since the SMO? I can probably count on half of a hand how often I sourced RT for this very reason.
Who? Who is going to want to jump in to defend Poland? I guarantee you the US will hustle Poland into making a move (or they may just feel compelled on their own) and the Poles are going to go in thinking they are going to have the 800 lb NATO gorilla behind them.Though I would recommend some form of restraint, this would at the very least draw in other NATO members in Europe, and much more advanced weapons from our side. Russia would be in a world of hurt.
Have I needed to source Russia Today often since the SMO? I can probably count on half of a hand how often I sourced RT for this very reason.
The complete opposite. You guys are delusional. The main objective of trying to drain Russia of military resources is not working. In fact, the complete opposite is happening.
An investment???
Who? Who is going to want to jump in to defend Poland? I guarantee you the US will hustle Poland into making a move (or they may just feel compelled on their own) and the Poles are going to go in thinking they are going to have the 800 lb NATO gorilla behind them.
You all have already admitted that it is about "degrading" Russia's military and drag this out as long as possible. And some of you same people will be saying the Poles are fighting and dying so that the US won't have to.
I watched a video of a Russian APC drive straight into an obvious minefield and get blown up. As the Russian soldiers, still on fire, tried to get out, a second APC drove right by them and got blown up in the same minefield.