War in Ukraine

[Septic]

NATO is expanding their footprint, Russia has a shrinking sphere of influence. You couldn't make a more ridiculous assertion.

Give him 5 minutes.

 

[tvolsfan]

Russia couldnt really shrink their sphere of influence anymore than it was before the war. It has grown tremendously since the start of the war and will continue to grow after their victory.

As usual, US foreign policy accomplishes the opposite of their stated goals.

This is remarkably silly. Even their usual partners like Kazakhstan and Armenia are pushing back on them.

 

[NorthDallas40]

They are defeating NATO so I doubt NATO will come looking for another ass kicking in the near future.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Ohh, there have been close to 100k casualties in Bakhmut, Kirby was partially right. I think the intel leak will let folks know who lost the 100k.

Oh it did but the Russian ******** you keep regurgitating flips the sides, Larry

 

[tvolsfan]

Oh it did but the Russian ******** you keep regurgitating flips the sides, Larry

Yeah, and he can’t even say that’s the true numbers. It is an obvious photoshop job with a verifiable source.

 

[LouderVol]

Funny, NATO says differently.

where?

 

[LouderVol]

Just think, if there are supposedly 200k Russian dead/wounded, how many for Ukraine at 7:1?

1.4 million. see how dumb that number is? Ukraine would literally be falling apart if they were anywhere close to that number. you are just too biased to see it as complete bs.

7:1 came from the same source that gave you those "Sim Cards", and said the Moskva was just fine.

7:1 and Russia would have no need to conscript 500k

7:1 and Russia wouldn't be dusting off T-64s

7:1 and Russia is walking though Bahkmut instead of still struggling after 9 months.

7:1 and Ukraine wouldn't even be contemplating another offensive.

there is literally no evidence for, or reason to believe the k/d ratio is 7:1; especially not in favor of Russia.

 

[WilcoVolsFan]

Just think, if there are supposedly 200k Russian dead/wounded, how many for Ukraine at 7:1?

Just think, if everyone was as gullible and eager to swallow Russian propaganda as this commie-lover, I'd have to replace my bourbon collection w/vodka bottles.

 

[Rocky_Top_Vol13]

 

[scooty_vol]

Politicians and defense contractors are rubbing their hands together dreaming of the Billions coming their way.

It's a matter of time until the defense contractor talk the obama.jr regime in putter troops in ukraine

 

[scooty_vol]

Why don't we see Ukrainian losses?

 

[MontyPython]

Ohh, there have been close to 100k casualties in Bakhmut, Kirby was partially right. I think the intel leak will let folks know who lost the 100k.

Oh yeah?

Provide that intel leak.

 

[Septic]

Why don't we see Ukrainian losses?

Because that would be helpful intel to the Orcs.

That's been overtly stated.

 

[PEPPERJAX]

Why don't we see Ukrainian losses?

All of the Ukrainian soldiers are essentially a combination of Arnold from Commando and The Predator.

 

[volgr]

where?

Where NATO admits they were never interested in living up to Minsk but using it as chance to arm and train Ukraine?

 

[volgr]

1.4 million. see how dumb that number is? Ukraine would literally be falling apart if they were anywhere close to that number. you are just too biased to see it as complete bs.

7:1 came from the same source that gave you those "Sim Cards", and said the Moskva was just fine.

7:1 and Russia would have no need to conscript 500k

7:1 and Russia wouldn't be dusting off T-64s

7:1 and Russia is walking though Bahkmut instead of still struggling after 9 months.

7:1 and Ukraine wouldn't even be contemplating another offensive.

there is literally no evidence for, or reason to believe the k/d ratio is 7:1; especially not in favor of Russia.

Yes, because the number that is wrong is the 7:1, not the 200k dead/wounded Russians. Give me a break. You guys live in a weird alternate reality.

 

[AM64]

Where NATO admits they were never interested in living up to Minsk but using it as chance to arm and train Ukraine?

Funny though that NATO has never invaded Russia or provoked "NATO sympathizers" living on Russian soil into insurgencies or uprisings.

 

[volgr]

Funny though that NATO has never invaded Russia or provoked "NATO sympathizers" living on Russian soil into insurgencies or uprisings.

Why is it funny? Funny that NATO broke a treaty to further escalate with Russia? Funny that NATO has pushed Ukraine into this conflict? I dont see anything funny about it.

 

[MG1968]

Why is it funny? Funny that NATO broke a treaty to further escalate with Russia? Funny that NATO has pushed Ukraine into this conflict? I dont see anything funny about it.

It’s funny that you’ll blame everyone except Russia, who broke treaties as well.

 

[BeardedVol]

Why is it funny? Funny that NATO broke a treaty to further escalate with Russia? Funny that NATO has pushed Ukraine into this conflict? I dont see anything funny about it.

What is the name of this treaty between NATO and the Russian Federation, that you believe was broken by NATO?

 

[Rasputin_Vol]

Funny though that NATO has never invaded Russia or provoked "NATO sympathizers" living on Russian soil into insurgencies or uprisings.

Sure. NATO hasn't invaded Russia. But NATO does have a track record of invading (Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Serbia, Panama).

 

[AM64]

Sure. NATO hasn't invaded Russia. But NATO does have a track record of invading (Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Serbia, Panama).

NATO officially invaded those places? Who knew.

 

[FLVOL_79]

They are defeating NATO so I doubt NATO will come looking for another ass kicking in the near future.

Probably top 5 most retarded things I've seen posted on this board.

That isn't a compliment.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Just think, if everyone was as gullible and eager to swallow Russian propaganda as this commie-lover, I'd have to replace my bourbon collection w/vodka bottles.

What if you pour your bourbon INTO vodka bottles? Confuse them all.

 

[MontyPython]

Yes, because the number that is wrong is the 7:1, not the 200k dead/wounded Russians. Give me a break. You guys live in a weird alternate reality.

So which large land mass shall Russia lose next... to the East towards Starbolisk or South into Zaporizhzhia?

You know it's gonna happen Comrade... and soon.