The broadcast team, in my humble opinion, has more of a right to use we or us than people on this board do. And it happens in every thread. Well except people who actually participated in athletic events sanctioned by the University of Tennessee or Fostermom...
I understand your point and it is a good one. You're just used to the professionality utilized by "our" old school announcer, John Ward. I was simply pointing out that I read a lot of posters in here using our and we when referring to the Volunteers. I personally try to avoid it but sometimes slip up and say it but don't begrudge others for saying it. ardon:I was trying to wind this down, but feel compelled to point out:
I don't dispute their right to use it. I just question whether it comports with standards we should expect of broadcasters. The consensus here seems to be that it does, in spite of my own opinion.
I understand your point and it is a good one. You're just used to the professionality utilized by "our" old school announcer, John Ward. I was simply pointing out that I read a lot of posters in here using our and we when referring to the Volunteers. I personally try to avoid it but sometimes slip up and say it but don't begrudge others for saying it. ardon:
Well, I've talked to Rob Fischer, Dave Woloshin, George Lapides and Jeff Weinberger live on the air... lol:Understood. I think there is a distinction though. I myself do say "we" and "us" when talking about the Vols. I've never taken a snap or an inbound pass, and never even attended U.T. But they are still "my" teams- teams that I follow and love. I think it's fine for casual conversation among fans. I would just rather our broadcasters not use the terms.
And when I say "our broadcasters" I don't mean to imply I've ever discussed the Vols on air - unless you include local talk radio. Or discussions I have had on amateur radio.
I agree about Woloshin but I did win a $30 gift certificate for Grisanti's Bolla Pasta from him in his Handsome Dan biggest loser contest when I picked Wyoming to beat the spread against Tennessee. Didn't think they would win the game though.I am kind of fond of Lapides. Woloshin is a horrible homer for the U. of Mem., who I dislike intensely. I like Jeff though.
so let me get this straight.... Vol fans our upset that our or I'm sorry Tennessee's broadcasters are using ''we" or "us"......lmao you have got to be kidding me. Certainly wouldn't be appropriate if they were broadcasting for fox sports or CBS but this is the vols broadcast team and if anyone should be offended by it...or annoyed...it should be a non biased party listening in.
I just don't agree that they should be calling the games "as fans." They can love the University, be excited when good plays are made, etc., but I do expect them to be as objective as possible. But I'm beginning to think I'm in a minority.
LOL. They are paid by the University. Bert played here. He can say we if he wants.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I don't care if it is for local, national, university owned, or any of the like - if you are a credentialed journalist/broadcaster calling or writing on a game it is expected to be an non bias report.
The Daily Beacon - the school's student newspaper doesn't use "we" or "us".
And inside the media world you are considered a homer and lose all credibility for using those attributes.
In this case in particular, Bob Kesling rarely uses the term "we" or "us". Bert never stops. It is what it is and people have excepted it, but he is getting paid for a service and should conduct himself in a professional manner.
Did you ever hear John Ward say "we" or "us". He could have gotten away with it, but he knows what it means to be a true broadcaster.
They all do it, but the point here is that they shouldn't.
Yes they should.
Why not? You think they will get a larger audience base from across the nation if they are less partial? Lol.
That won't help them one bit - and they'll also lose people who don't want to listen to a bunch of boring guys like on the NFL radio. Puts you right to sleep.