Purple Tiger
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
- Messages
- 4,247
- Likes
- 1,425
Did I say that? The point of the story was not go and sin no more, but those without sin can cast the first stone.
He and his partner bought a Tesla. I think they'd been wanting one for a while.
In regards to where he went, at one time i think they were considering an opportunity in another country.
Well, you came into a conversation about how Christians should act, after telling us earlier that...Did I say that? The point of the story was not go and sin no more, but those without sin can cast the first stone.
This is the way our society should be, according to Jesus:
John 13:34-35: A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
So, we need to consider why He was telling people to stop sinning.It was both.
Jesus was stating that all are sinners and need forgiveness and no one is perfect. He was also telling her to try harder and be a better person.
The whole thing boils down to we all suck and have our own issues but we need to try to overcome them.
If you ask a question that is loaded with false assumptions, why would I answer? I pointed those out. If you want to ask a revised question based on that I’ll be glad to answer:Asking questions isn't making assumptions. And you didn't really answer the questions.
You're concerned for civilization and liberty, so you're arguing against liberty for homosexuals? What?
If you ask a question that is loaded with false assumptions, why would I answer? I pointed those out. If you want to ask a revised question based on that I’ll be glad to answer.Asking questions isn't making assumptions. And you didn't really answer the questions.
You're concerned for civilization and liberty, so you're arguing against liberty for homosexuals? What?
So, we need to consider why He was telling people to stop sinning.
As posted earlier that it's better to gouge out eyes and cut off hands than to sin. He saw it as destructive to the individual sinning and the individual who is sinned against. It seems a preview of the principle in Romans that "the wages of sin is death".
So, if sin is destructive and damaging to the person doing it, is it unloving to point out that it is destructive to the person committing it, and offering the opinion that they should stop?
In Jesus 3, Jesus tied sin (evil works) to physical death and eternal condemnation.
Again... If this is true... Even if you only believe it's true, is it unloving or loving to warn people of their sin?
From Old Testament to New, we see the pattern of the gospel was Expose sin (guilt) > offer grace > salvation. (It makes no sense to tell someone they need God's grace without having first told them that they have sinned against Him.) For example, you can see Jesus' interaction with the woman at the well. Pointed out her sin (adultery), offered grace, salvation.
So again... Is it hateful and unloving to work through a progression that ends in their receiving their greatest need?
The point Purple seems to be taking issue with is Jesus as the example. If Jesus is God and exemplifies love, and Jesus exposed people's sin, then is it unloving (hateful) to expose sin?
((That wasn't an argument or debate with you. It was using your reply as an opportunity to continue the conversation.))
Seems to be. He was busy with event security at the Rose Bowl earlier in the month. His attitude is good.
I am considering going to OK for the UT game. If I do, I was gonna pay him a visit. Don't tell Louder.