MercyPercy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2012
- Messages
- 8,720
- Likes
- 8,320
One of us is missing something
U knew he was a POS. He is. Check
U knew he was s crooked business man. He is and has been for approx 40 years. Check
You voted for him. You got him. Check
If he winds up being impeached?YDGAF. Good. Check
No, actually it wasn't inaccurate and biased. It's based on facts. You have fallen victim to the "Admiral on the Bridge" perspective. So the Engine Room calls you up and says they have flooding, with water coming in at 500 gpm. 15 minutes later they call up and say the rate is now 250 gpm. You, being an Admiral and all that, say "Well, that's not nearly as bad as it was before." And yet your ship is still sinking.
He's still waiting on his answer, and I noticed you've moved the goal posts again...well, in this case, shifted the spotlight...towards the President, who's doing all he can to stop the uncontrolled influx (there, I avoided the word "hordes") of illegal immigrants into the country.
You're an interesting character, luther. I'm no globe-hopper, but I've put a few miles on the odometer going wherever my Uncle wanted me to go back in the day, and I've seen both sides of the issue. Literally. I guess my question would be whether your opinions are based on personal experience and/or research, or on being told what the MSM wants you to believe.
There's a reason why academians (is that even a word?) rarely end up in the turret of a tank.
You do realize you just said "Words mean things loother" and then immediately followed that up with "what I asked originally is no different than the alternative phrasing". Pretty funny.Words mean things loother..... what I asked originally is no different than the alternative phrasing.... what answer was that?.... a mother and child wandering in?
What is bad about a large number of third world illegals entering into the US?
You do realize you just said "Words mean things loother" and then immediately followed that up with "what I asked originally is no different than the alternative phrasing". Pretty funny.
You agree that Trump's asinine and ineffective ugly wall is a stupid idea, right?
Do you agree with President Trump that a border wall is a necessity?
Don't you agree with President Trump that we need an inexpensive and effective barrier to protect innocent American women and children from the thousands of vicious illegal gang bangers, drug pushers, human traffickers, murderers, and rapists storming through our unprotected border daily?
See the difference? Same questions.....but not really.
1. I am against the wall that Trump proposes because much of it is unneeded according to the people most in a position to know, but mainly because of the way Trump has used the "Wall" as a divisive propaganda tool that will now and forever result in the wall being a negative symbol.Why are you against a border wall? Why do you support illegal immigrants? Why doesnt it bother you that these illegals bring drugs into this country? Why doesnt it bother you that some of these illegals are part of human trafficking rings? Why is it you cannot understand that we have immigration laws for a reason?
Imagine if there wasn't a war on drugs? That would actually be wonderful. Do you really believe the wod has been a positive thing for this country?
It's also highly unlikely you'll ever see me ask the govt to do more.
I did answer the question. You may have missed it while reeling from having the ignorance of your post pointed out.You're such a poon.... it's disgusting. You can't even answer a simple question. The words I used had the same meaning you ignorant dip****.
You can't answer the question so you deflect to some insignificant BS.
Really because the DHS and Border Patrol have said numerous times that a physical barrier or "Wall" would make their jobs much easier and safer for their agents.1. I am against the wall that Trump proposes because much of it is unneeded according to the people most in a position to know, but mainly because of the way Trump has used the "Wall" as a divisive propaganda tool that will now and forever result in the wall being a negative symbol.
Pretty much everyone has always maintained that there are areas where a barrier helps. That's why there are so many areas with barriers provided by previous administrations and congresses. Trump's continuous wall is seen as unnecessary by all but the most diehard redhatters.Really because the DHS and Border Patrol have said numerous times that a physical barrier or "Wall" would make their jobs much easier and safer for their agents.
To my knowledge the President has never said there would be a continuous border wall from the Pacific to the Gulf of Mexico.Pretty much everyone has always maintained that there are areas where a barrier helps. That's why there are so many areas with barriers provided by previous administrations and congresses. Trump's continuous wall is seen as unnecessary by all but the most diehard redhatters.