Web Censorship and Political Bias

[Electric Orange]

 

[CagleMtnVol]

Twitter Bans Jewish Star of David in Profile Images - Deems it "Hateful Imagery"

I'm sure our resident libs have no problem with this.

 

[Electric Orange]

I'm sure our resident libs have no problem with this.

Course not.

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[Mick]

I remember when volprof was banned from VN, it was celebrated. I'm sure if I was banned, nobody would care.

 

[Rickyvol77]

I remember when volprof was banned from VN, it was celebrated. I'm sure if I was banned, nobody would care.

I would care, because i support 100% you having the ability to give your opinions, no matter how right, how wrong, how trollish...

The only people who ever should be banned from posting anywhere (including Twitter, FB, here, etc) should be those who make credible threats towards others and those who just have mindless spam

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[Electric Orange]

I remember when volprof was banned from VN, it was celebrated. I'm sure if I was banned, nobody would care.

Why did that person get banned?

 

[37L1]

I remember when volprof was banned from VN, it was celebrated. I'm sure if I was banned, nobody would care.

Now I understand you.

Poor, poor, pitiful you.

Well, I met a girl at the Rainbow bar
She asked me if I'd beat her
She took me back to the Hyatt House
I don't want to talk about it

Poor, poor pitiful me
Poor, poor pitiful me

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[BigOrangeD]

Washington Post settles Nicholas Sandmann defamation lawsuit in Covington Catholic High School controversy

...
Sandmann offered a not-so-subtle warning to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey.
"We have settled with WAPO and CNN. The fight isn’t over. 2 down. 6 to go. Don’t hold your breath @jack," Sandmann tweeted.
...

 

[Wafflestomper]

Washington Post settles Nicholas Sandmann defamation lawsuit in Covington Catholic High School controversy

Im curious--how does twitter fit into this?

 

[PEPPERJAX]

I remember when volprof was banned from VN, it was celebrated. I'm sure if I was banned, nobody would care.

You like Reservoir Dogs so that is enough for me. Stay cool brah.

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[BigOrangeD]

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[Electric Orange]

They just fu**** up

 

[BigOrangeD]

Worth reposting.

 

[Electric Orange]

Worth reposting.

 

[BigOrangeD]

Twitter proving their Liberal Marxists ways again.

Twitter Locks Breitbart Account over Viral Videos of Doctors’ Capitol Hill Coronavirus Presser

Twitter deleted Breitbart News’ Periscope livestream of a Washington D.C. press conference held on Monday by the group America’s Frontline Doctors and organized and sponsored by the Tea Party Patriots.

 

[Franklin Pierce]

I remember when volprof was banned from VN, it was celebrated. I'm sure if I was banned, nobody would care.

What did he say to get banned?

 

[Franklin Pierce]

Election Interference: Google Purges Breitbart from Search Results

A few days after the 2016 election, at an internal meeting later leaked to Breitbart News, top Google executives, including Sundar Pichai, Sergey Brin, and Kent Walker, lamented President Trump’s victory, comparing Trump voters to “extremists” and discussing their desire to make Trump’s election and the populist movement a “blip” in history.

True to their word, four years later, Google is deliberately working to interfere with the reelection of Trump in 2020.

There are several ways in which Google is interfering in the 2020 election, but this article will focus primarily on one of them: political search bias.

Google Has Been Purging Breitbart Content from Search Results Since the 2016 Election

Search visibility is a key industry measure of how findable a publisher’s content is in Google search. New data shows that Google has suppressed Breitbart’s search visibility by 99.7 percent since 2016.

On April 4, 2016, Breitbart ranked in the top ten search positions (i.e., on the first page of Google search results) for 355 key search terms; but now, as of July 20, 2020, Breitbart ranks in the top ten search position for only one search term. And, on April 4, 2016, Breitbart ranked in the top 100 search positions for 16,820 key search terms; but now, as of July 20, 2020, Breitbart ranks in the top ten search positions for only 55 search terms.

Moreover, organic Google search traffic to Breitbart (measured by unique visitors) is down 63 percent when comparing the first half of 2016 with the first half of 2020.

Google Just Killed All Search Traffic to Breitbart for Joe Biden and Joe Biden-Related Searches

After Google’s May core search update on or about May 5, 2020, Google search impressions and search traffic to Breitbart for “Joe Biden” and other Biden-related search terms has gone to zero. Zero. The following graph clearly illustrates the foregoing.

Breitbart News spoke to an SEO (Search Engine Optimization) expert, a 25-year industry veteran, whose job consists of analyzing traffic data from Google’s own website performance portal, Google Search Console.

The expert, who wished to remain anonymous, said he had never seen anything like this graph — and that it indicates highly probable manipulation on the part of Google.

“I’ve never experienced such a wholesale removal of rank and visibility on specific concepts on a site as I have seen being applied to Breitbart,” said the expert. “Removal is the key, not dropping in rank, which would be an organic devaluing. These ranks are just simply gone, overnight, while other topics have been untouched.”

“The sheer fact that there are thousands of pages of Breitbart content that reference Biden that were ranking before May 6, that now have no rank or impressions on search is a sign of manipulation, not algorithmic devaluing.”

Election Interference: Google Purges Breitbart from Search Results

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[Electric Orange]