Web Censorship and Political Bias

#1,235
#1,235
hog88 said:
Possibly but not yet proven.
Click to expand...
From the very minute Barr's "unmasking probe" went up in smoke, the right has started to look desperate for an October surprise. The more they have to talk about Hunter Biden, the more it becomes clear, that they simply don't have any legitimate dirt on Joe.
 
#1,239
#1,239
1972 Grad said:
Russia, Russia, Russia.
Click to expand...
We were also promised the Durham report before the election, but that's not happening either, is it? Sen. Ron Johnson's investigation didn't turn over any new information ... It doesn't look like Democrats are the only ones to over-promise and under-deliver when it comes to the next big scandal.
 
#1,240
#1,240
BowlBrother85 said:
The NY Post "bombshell" was nothing more than Russian-spread disinformation.
Click to expand...

So you say - but it is sufficient evidence that Joe Biden should at least unequivocally deny his own personal involvement in any thing that his son may or may not have been doing. This isnt merely an unfounded allegation by anonymous or even named witnesses. It is also a long way from being proof of anything - at least against Joe Biden and he is the only one running for office and who held office at the time of these allegations. It is easy enough for him to say he never met with those people and he absolutely has taken no money from them, either directly or through a family member. And yet, he has not. I wonder why?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and tennvols77
#1,241
#1,241
BowlBrother85 said:
We were also promised the Durham report before the election, but that's not happening either, is it? Sen. Ron Johnson's investigation didn't turn over any new information ... It doesn't look like Democrats are the only ones to over-promise and under-deliver when it comes to the next big scandal.
Click to expand...
Barr didn't want to be accused of trying to influence the election, and you will see the Durham report soon afterward.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#1,243
#1,243
BowlBrother85 said:
It's not worth dignifying with a response. It's part of a Russian disinformation campaign.
Click to expand...
If you will recall, 18 months or so ago, I said that Biden wouldn't be the nominee due to any or all of the following.

1) Biden will step on his Johnson and say something even dumber than normal for him.
2) Biden's physical or mental health.
3) Biden's possible involvement in Russiagate.
4) Biden and/or his son's involvement with China/Ukraine.

The only mistake that I made was that I didn't see the Dem Party using Biden as a Trojan horse (putting up an old man that appears non-threatening) to get Kamala in office, because I think all 4 should be disqualifying. I underestimated the depths to which they would sink.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and BigOrangeD
#1,244
#1,244
1972 Grad said:
If you will recall, 18 months or so ago, I said that Biden wouldn't be the nominee due to any or all of the following.

1) Biden will step on his Johnson and say something even dumber than normal for him.
2) Biden's physical or mental health.
3) Biden's possible involvement in Russiagate.
4) Biden and/or his son's involvement with China/Ukraine.

The only mistake that I made was that I didn't see the Dem Party using Biden as a Trojan horse (putting up an old man that appears non-threatening) to get Kamala in office, because I think all 4 should be disqualifying. I underestimated the depths to which they would sink.
Click to expand...
You didn't want Biden to be the Democratic Party nominee for the same reason that Trump didn't want to face Biden a year ago: Biden is much harder to label as a socialist. Biden is also reasonably well-liked by the American people. He hasn't been tarnished by the radical, fringe elements of the party.
 
#1,245
#1,245
evillawyer said:
Yes, people with degrees from elite colleges tend to vote Dem. Imagine that.
Click to expand...

Of course they are. Liberals who attend elite colleges plan to be the more equal animals which is harder in a non-liberal society. Imagine that - sitting pompously in front of a bunch of pampered, naïve kids infecting their tiny little minds with communist dogma.
 
#1,247
#1,247
#1,248
#1,248
BowlBrother85 said:
You didn't want Biden to be the Democratic Party nominee for the same reason that Trump didn't want to face Biden a year ago: Biden is much harder to label as a socialist. Biden is also reasonably well-liked by the American people. He hasn't been tarnished by the radical, fringe elements of the party.
Click to expand...
So, he really isn't for packing the Court, abolishing fracking, and letting an 8 year old decide it wants to change sexes? Let me see if I understand, ......................a 16 year minor is too young to consent too having sex with an adult (like Judge Roy) , but if she was 8, then she is not too young to sew on a Johnson and become a boy?
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top