Vjcvette
1977KnoxGal
- Joined
- May 2, 2020
- Messages
- 13,490
- Likes
- 29,066
Ha, just an extra and unwelcome day added to an otherwise fun trip to Portland and the Oregon shore.need details
Everytime I hear stories about air travel it just reinforces my distaste for it.Ha, just an extra and unwelcome day added to an otherwise fun trip to Portland and the Oregon shore.
On the leg back from Portland to Chicago O’Hare, there were thunderstorms around Chicago, and ATC put us in a holding pattern. (This is sort of fun to watch on the live map of the flight, up to a point.) It went on so long that we hit the minimum fuel reserve and had to fly back to Des Moines for more fuel. Where we sat on some remote corner of the airport for 45 minutes or so while nearly everyone on the flight tried to reschedule connecting flights. The best we could get was for the next afternoon.
When we finally made it to O’Hare, United wouldn’t give us back our checked bags (without a 3+ hour wait), so we slept in our clothes. We usually pack necessities in our carryons but had skimped this time, including no deodorant. Fortunately, we’d been booked side-by-side on the flight home, instead of across the aisle from each other (our usual choice), so we kept our fumes pretty much to ourselves.
Finally made it home yesterday evening.
The thing we found most interesting is that the flights from Asheville to Chicago and back on the “little plane” were FAR more comfortable than those on the Chicago-Portland legs. The Embraer 175 twin jet has four seats per row (2+2) in economy instead of six (3+3) on the Airbus and the Boeing 737 Max 9, aka the pop-a-door-off-in-flight jet. Seats were farther apart on the Embraer - way more legroom.Everytime I hear stories about air travel it just reinforces my distaste for it.
The last time that I flew on one of those regional jets, we had to walk out onto the tarmac to board (ah, memories). The seats were as you said. The crew was great, and the flight was a pleasure.The thing we found most interesting is that the flights from Asheville to Chicago and back on the “little plane” were FAR more comfortable than those on the Chicago-Portland legs. The Embraer 175 twin jet has four seats per row (2+2) in economy instead of six (3+3) on the Airbus and the Boeing 737 Max 9, aka the pop-a-door-off-in-flight jet. Seats were farther apart on the Embraer - way more legroom.
I wouldn’t mind traveling on them exclusively, but at some point, you wind up on a flying cattle car.
Yep, jetways on the Chicago end, but tarmac at AVL, but that’s because they’re expanding the north end of the terminal and there wasn’t really a gate.The last time that I flew on one of those regional jets, we had to walk out onto the tarmac to board (ah, memories). The seats were as you said. The crew was great, and the flight was a pleasure.
I remember flying Trcities to Vegas. The little prop driven puddle jumpers they used to use to take you to Atlanta were way more roomy. The big jet they stuck us one for the Atlanta to Vegas leg was way more crowded. That was about 100 lbs ago for me. I'd probably be completely miserable now.The thing we found most interesting is that the flights from Asheville to Chicago and back on the “little plane” were FAR more comfortable than those on the Chicago-Portland legs. The Embraer 175 twin jet has four seats per row (2+2) in economy instead of six (3+3) on the Airbus and the Boeing 737 Max 9, aka the pop-a-door-off-in-flight jet. Seats were farther apart on the Embraer - way more legroom.
I wouldn’t mind traveling on them exclusively, but at some point, you wind up on a flying cattle car.
I wish we had a serious passenger train system in this country, but I think that had to develop through the 19th and early 20th centuries, as in Europe, to have acquired the rights-of-way and all. We’re pretty well stuck with air and vehicles. (Don’t get me started on the grey dog and friends.)I remember flying Trcities to Vegas. The little prop driven puddle jumpers they used to use to take you to Atlanta were way more roomy. The big jet they stuck us one for the Atlanta to Vegas leg was way more crowded. That was about 100 lbs ago for me. I'd probably be completely miserable now.
That's not even the worst part for me. I have issues with my ear and they won't pop very readily. The pressure build up during decent gives me a head ache for hours in any pressurized plane.
I think I'll just rent a van for long trips.
UghhHa, just an extra and unwelcome day added to an otherwise fun trip to Portland and the Oregon shore.
On the leg back from Portland to Chicago O’Hare, there were thunderstorms around Chicago, and ATC put us in a holding pattern. (This is sort of fun to watch on the live map of the flight, up to a point.) It went on so long that we hit the minimum fuel reserve and had to fly back to Des Moines for more fuel. Where we sat on some remote corner of the airport for 45 minutes or so while nearly everyone on the flight tried to reschedule connecting flights. The best we could get was for the next afternoon.
When we finally made it to O’Hare, United wouldn’t give us back our checked bags (without a 3+ hour wait), so we slept in our clothes. We usually pack necessities in our carryons but had skimped this time, including no deodorant. Fortunately, we’d been booked side-by-side on the flight home, instead of across the aisle from each other (our usual choice), so we kept our fumes pretty much to ourselves.
Finally made it home yesterday evening.