One element that is difficult to predict in scenarios like this is what effect Peytons return would have had on team chemistry. Would Al Wilson have seized leadership ownership of the 98 team to the extent that he did if Peyton had returned for the 98 season? I am reminded of the 1985 team and the performance of the defense before and after Tony Robinson went down with a knee injury against Alabama. Daryl Dickey proved to be a fine game-manager but he clearly did not possess the physical talent of Robinson. The defense, however, circled the wagons and played with a fury that they had not consistently demonstrated prior to Robinsons injury. That level of performance culminated in their 35-7 rout of Miami.
With respect to arguments pertaining to how much credit Tee Martin personally deserved for the 98 national championship, I have the utmost respect and fond memories of what Tee accomplished that year. However, I would submit the following information for your consideration:
In 1997, Peyton led us to a SEC championship and was 287-477-11 for 3819 yds. and 36 tds.
In 1998, Tee was 153-267-6 for 2164 yds. and 19 tds. As best I recall, he ran for around 300 yds. that year.
When you compare QB production from 1997 to 1998, you lose 1700 yds. and 17 tds. through the air. Tee didn't make up the difference with yardage he gained running.
What was the difference in terms of overall team performance? A strong running game that, in 1998, posted an SEC-best 211.3 ypg (most of which was provided by Travis Henry, Travis Stephens and Jamal Lewis), and a defense, led by the iron-willed Al Wilson, that gave up only 189 points (in 13 games), compared to the '97 team which yielded 286 points (see
Tennessee Historical Scores). Overall scoring for Tennessee was virtually identical, 431 points in '98, compared to 428 in '97. In short, a stout defense and hardnosed running game has always been and remains a winning formula in the SEC.