Adam Sandler
No Colonel Sanders, you’re wrong!
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2009
- Messages
- 11,847
- Likes
- 29,415
Don't see how it would be a letdown, top-15 opponent on the road while we're down Hadden and others. a close one means it can go either way. Vegas, etc has it a +/- 1 pt game.Losing this game would be a letdown. I don’t see it. I could see a close one like Kentucky. I could also see us winning by 3 scores. Vols roll in mizzou this weekend.
Close your eyes a little tighter... close your mind a little more.Good grief
I don’t care what wristbands they had. They still had to execute. Our DBs got torched and it had nothing to do with cheating. Hooker was asked about the cheating in the SC game. He pretty much all but shot it down.Close your eyes a little tighter... close your mind a little more.
There are some legs to that story. The pieces may never be tied together but Michigan did steal signs illegally and did have a vested interest in seeing UT and Clemson both lose. Oh... and there is a connection between the Michigan analyst and the USCe staff... and a USCe HC who was previously fined for cheating.
All kinds of circumstantial evidence and some direct evidence.
Imagine how empty Neyland would look with only 61k fans. Like COVID spacing.I saw a post they sold out this game yesterday. lol 61k people is all their stadium holds and some of them will be our band and fans…so that’s cute and sad it took that long after we just sold out UConn
Probably have more rocks than real mizzou fans
I pray their team is dumb and underestimating as their fans are. We could drop this one, but if they take that attitude, we could also destroy them, and that would be awesome.
Continuing to question a suspicious set of circumstances is neither dumb nor petty. Yeah, we got our asses beat but the why is relevant.I don’t care what wristbands they had. They still had to execute. Our DBs got torched and it had nothing to do with cheating. Hooker was asked about the cheating in the SC game. He pretty much all but shot it down.
The bottom line is we had internal issues that kept us from performing at our highest level. Could you not see something was wrong with the team? Hell even my mom said UT doesn’t look right. They look flat and not ready to play. Continuing this ridiculous cheating narrative looks incredibly dumb and petty. We got our asses beat. Simple as that.
And JH is 6-2 in games with a one point spread at TennesseeDon't see how it would be a letdown, top-15 opponent on the road while we're down Hadden and others. a close one means it can go either way. Vegas, etc has it a +/- 1 pt game.
We'll have to bring our A game. Their strength is passing with a 2-3 headed monster and we're now down our best DB by far. That's scary especially if our pass rush doesn't reignite.
Our offense will have to score TDs and not FGs. STs will need to win as well.
I predict a very frustrating back and forth on the road. Slightly optimistic we win a close one.
So what? Our defense could have played the whole game in Lazy Boy recliners and it would still be irrelevant to whether SC cheated ot not. Your whole argument is a Non Sequitur. One things has nothing do to with the other.I don’t care what wristbands they had. They still had to execute. Our DBs got torched and it had nothing to do with cheating. Hooker was asked about the cheating in the SC game. He pretty much all but shot it down.
The bottom line is we had internal issues that kept us from performing at our highest level. Could you not see something was wrong with the team? Hell even my mom said UT doesn’t look right. They look flat and not ready to play. Continuing this ridiculous cheating narrative looks incredibly dumb and petty. We got our asses beat. Simple as that.