WhatsAppgate: shall I remind all of you of the locker her up chants???

#201
#201
luthervol said:
I've said from the beginning I will accept the results, tip my hat, and say thanks for doing a professional job.
IF, Trump does not insist on getting the report first.
IF, Trump demands the report first, all bets are off.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter who gets it first (which will be Barr) because there will be multiple copies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#206
#206
luthervol said:
He was impeached. I think his overall transgressions do not amount to 1/20 of Trump's. We'll see if Trump is dealt with as harshly as was Clinton.
Click to expand...
I thought you just said you are open to the results of the investigation. This post doesn’t sound like it at all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#210
#210
luthervol said:
I never said Hillary didn't mishandle classified documents. I think classified documents are mishandled frequently, and that anyone who handles classified information daily over a period of years is bound to mishandle it a few times. Seems as if the level and/or intent of Hillary's transgressions didn't rise to the level of prosecution. We will now see if the level and/or intent of Trump's transgressions rise to the level of prosecution.
Click to expand...
wow.

I can guarantee you that if a 2nd LT did 1/1024th of what your **** did he would be buried in Levenworth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dezul
#211
#211
Mick said:
You have no concept of interpersonal relationships because you're a self centered glutton.
Click to expand...

LOL

No I just choose to be as honest as I can. If you ask "was that stupid" I'll tell you it was.
 
#213
#213
Mick said:
You have no concept of interpersonal relationships because you're a self centered glutton.
Click to expand...

LOL. Have you yourself looked in the mirror lately. You & Luther are both two huge fatties feasting hook line & sinker on the hate that only comes from the left-wing idiot buffet table.
 
#216
#216
hog88 said:
Umm no it isn’t legal. Where do you people come up with this crap?
Click to expand...

Google "Section 702"

"Section 702 is supposed to do exactly what its name promises: collection of foreign intelligence from non-Americans located outside the United States. As the law is written, the intelligence community cannot use Section 702 programs to target Americans, who are protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. But the law gives the intelligence community space to target foreign intelligence in ways that inherently and intentionally sweep in Americans’ communications."
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#217
#217
hog88 said:
LOL

No I just choose to be as honest as I can. If you ask "was that stupid" I'll tell you it was.
Click to expand...
Honesty is the best policy unless you are asked to tell the truth under oath, then you retreat to closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and say Lalalalalalalalalalalala I don't want to know the truth.
 
#220
#220
Hunerwadel said:
Google "Section 702"

"Section 702 is supposed to do exactly what its name promises: collection of foreign intelligence from non-Americans located outside the United States. As the law is written, the intelligence community cannot use Section 702 programs to target Americans, who are protected by the Fourth Amendment’s prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures. But the law gives the intelligence community space to target foreign intelligence in ways that inherently and intentionally sweep in Americans’ communications."
Click to expand...

Keep reading. You'll come to the part that deals with instances when the do sweep in an American.
 
#221
#221
Mick said:
Honesty is the best policy unless you are asked to tell the truth under oath, then you retreat to closing your eyes, sticking your fingers in your ears and say Lalalalalalalalalalalala I don't want to know the truth.
Click to expand...

I have always told the truth while under oath.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top