MG1968
That’s No Moon…
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2006
- Messages
- 28,393
- Likes
- 19,328
The Weekly Standard isn't safe?
LG is scared he'll burst into flames if he clicks on a link to a site that features regular contributors to Fox News.
I don't click on links to any blog or non-mainstream media sources. And that is true on both the left and the right. I recall getting some vicious malware one time from a link Drudge had up to one of the British tabloids. Since then, I haven't been to his site at all and I don't trust Daily Caller, Beast, etc.
I don't think those sites do that on purpose. I think the malware guys are good at getting past the security of maybe some of the less well heeled outfits and compromising their links.
Just a personal rule of mine after that one problem. It was a pain in the arse.
your willingness to stick to the worst news delivery sites is why you end up so often arguing party line silliness.
Look around a little every once in a while and form your own opinion. I'm not saying you've demonstrated any capacity to learn or reason, because that's crazy, but you might post something that isn't the loony left view of the world.
your willingness to stick to the worst news delivery sites is why you end up so often arguing party line silliness.
Look around a little every once in a while and form your own opinion. I'm not saying you've demonstrated any capacity to learn or reason, because that's crazy, but you might post something that isn't the loony left view of the world.
who said anything about reading while checking your brain at the door?
There are plenty of posters here (or any board for that matter) that just trot out the party line for whatever their allegiance might be, and they give no reason for it.
I like to think I give a reason for mine (when we are having a serious discussion, of course). That you disagree with the reason or think my logic wrong, that's fine. But I was hoping I wouldn't be viewed as one who just parrots those who are more in line with my own political thinking.
It puts Romney in a tough spot if its true and they can't be caught in time. If he pays it, we will know because the returns won't be released as scheduled and that will create a lot of speculation about what was worth paying a million dollars to keep it secret. If he doesn't pay it, and they release them, he's almost certainly toast in the election.
He could have avoided it all by having released them a long time ago and just dealing with the fallout then.
Option C:
The criminals get painted as Obamaphiles, Romney looks like a victim of a major crime perpetrated by his opponent's supporters.
Of course, the crime never occurred, so there is nothing to worry about.