This is semantics. Call it whatever you want. The **** you’re saying, the **** you’re agreeing with, it puts you on the same ideological foundation as violent mass murderers. More than just this one.
Meanwhile, you’re operating from a world view that homogenizes entire groups of people with similar fundamental ideology, and assumes they’re all as bad as their worst members.
Turn that around and apply it to your own groups. Why should you not be the one who is marginalized/incarcerated/expelled for the good and protection of the rest of us?
The easy answer, that not one of you has come up with, is because you’re not like those people, even if you share similar fundamental views, you wouldn’t go that far. I hope that’s actually the case. I have no idea. But I assume it is because
every person of a specific faith/belief is not the same as every other person who shares that belief. Your own distinction from these people ought to make you understand that. The distinction of the Muslims you know ought to make you understand that.
If we all adopt this same ignorant world view that everybody who shares a particular label is just as dangerous/evil as the worst person who we feel shares that label then we all need to be afraid of each other and nobody deserves to be free.
It’s really not that complicated.
Also, your “simple question” asks me to explain myself for something that you assume I’m guilty of because you assume I’m the same as all the other people you’ve given a particular label. All of those assumptions are ignorant and fundamentally the same as what I’m criticizing you for. So no, I’m not going to validate that with an answer.