Who was the better President, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush?

Who was the better President, Bill Clinton or George W. Bush?

  • Total voters
    0
#27
#27
Kennedy bonks Monroe and it's Camelot.
Clinton bonks Lewinsky and it's atrocious infidelity.

And neither matter to me one bit.
 
#28
#28
Bubba by a landslide!

You had better bring krytonite!

bill-clinton-talking_390x276.jpg
 
#29
#29
JZVOL said:
You missed the point. You never want the same party controlling Congress and the presidency.
Click to expand...

We have had a Republican President the last 2 years, and a Democratic Congess, why hasn't it helped Bush then?
 
#31
#31
rjd970 said:
Just not sure why fidelity falls in the same "atrocious" category as military and intelligence services.
Click to expand...
it completed the list. The lies about it were clearly the problem and undermined the man as a president for quite a protracted period of his presidency.

The gutting of the military and intelligence services was a complete travesty and there are no excuses for that.
 
#32
#32
how is this relavant? obama is far more liberal than bill clinton. AND both reagan and bush are republicans. If you had argued that reagan was a good president so therefore bush would be a good president woudl that have been logical?
 
Last edited:
#34
#34
Bush, hands down.

Laura is better looking than Hillary, and his daughters are better looking than Chelsea.

he created the word "misunderestimated"
 
#35
#35
What did Clinton do that was so great? Happened to be sitting in the chair while the dot com boom happened? Sat by while terrorists repeatedly killed Americans overseas? Put people in place that helped to create this mortgage problem?
 
#36
#36
droski said:
how is this relavant? obama is far more liberal than bill clinton. AND both reagan and bush are republicans. If you had argued that reagan was a good president so therefore bush would be a good president woudl that have been logical?
Click to expand...

That's really the point. It's the same as the arguement that Carter was a bad President so Obama will be a bad President.

Everyone said Clinton was too liberal before he got in office, and Bush was a fisical conservative. In reality neither was true, and we won't know about the next President until after he gets in office.
 
#39
#39
allvol123 said:
What did Clinton do that was so great? Happened to be sitting in the chair while the dot com boom happened? Sat by while terrorists repeatedly killed Americans overseas? Put people in place that helped to create this mortgage problem?
Click to expand...

not to mention he invaded a sovereign country that posed no threat to the US and did so without the blessings of the United Nations. His administration also did nothing about the genocide in Rwanda and his supporters are now saying the US should put troops on the ground in The Sudan.

Then there's Waco and Elian Gonzales.
 
#40
#40
oklavol said:
That's really the point. It's the same as the arguement that Carter was a bad President so Obama will be a bad President.

Everyone said Clinton was too liberal before he got in office, and Bush was a fisical conservative. In reality neither was true, and we won't know about the next President until after he gets in office.
Click to expand...

You answered your own question about Dem Congress w/ Bush.
 
#41
#41
MG1968 said:
not to mention he invaded a sovereign country that posed no threat to the US and did so without the blessings of the United Nations. His administration also did nothing about the genocide in Rwanda and his supporters are now saying the US should put troops on the ground in The Sudan.

Then there's Waco and Elian Gonzales.
Click to expand...

You do not get it. He played the sax on Arsenio, he is awesome.
 
#42
#42
allvol123 said:
Sat by while terrorists repeatedly killed Americans overseas?
Click to expand...


I've heard this arguement before in here by different people.

The reality is, Clinton did try to take out Obama. When he did the Republican Congress condemned him for trying to distract the public from the Lewinsky scandal.

You can't have it both ways. You can't criticize him for not doing more, when he got royally criticized by the Republicans at the time when he did bomb his training camps in Afghanistan.
 
#43
#43
oklavol said:
I've heard this arguement before in here by different people.

The reality is, Clinton did try to take out Obama. When he did the Republican Congress condemned him for trying to distract the public from the Lewinsky scandal.

You can't have it both ways here. You can't criticize him for not doing more to take out Obama, when he got royally criticized by the Republicans at the time when he did bomb his camp in Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

:eek:lol:
 
#44
#44
MG1968 said:
not to mention he invaded a sovereign country that posed no threat to the US and did so without the blessings of the United Nations.
Click to expand...

Imagine that, invading a country that poses no threat to us.
 
#45
#45
oklavol said:
I've heard this arguement before in here by different people.

The reality is, Clinton did try to take out Obama. When he did the Republican Congress condemned him for trying to distract the public from the Lewinsky scandal.

You can't have it both ways. You can't criticize him for not doing more, when he got royally criticized by the Republicans at the time when he did bomb his training camps in Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

wasn't he too busy playing golf or something?
 
#46
#46
rjd970 said:
Imagine that, invading a country that poses no threat to us.
Click to expand...

yeah, democrats love doing that. Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Truman and JFK/LBJ are all democrats, all invaded countries that didn't attack the US and have the blood of over 600 thousand US military personnel on their hands.
 
#47
#47
oklavol said:
I've heard this arguement before in here by different people.

The reality is, Clinton did try to take out Obama. When he did the Republican Congress condemned him for trying to distract the public from the Lewinsky scandal.

You can't have it both ways. You can't criticize him for not doing more, when he got royally criticized by the Republicans at the time when he did bomb his training camps in Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

I wish he succeeded.
 
#48
#48
MG1968 said:
yeah, democrats love doing that. Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, Truman and JFK/LBJ are all democrats, all invaded countries that didn't attack the US and have the blood of over 600 thousand US military personnel on their hands.
Click to expand...

Who said anything about a country attacking us first?
 
#50
#50
oklavol said:
I've heard this arguement before in here by different people.

The reality is, Clinton did try to take out Obama. When he did the Republican Congress condemned him for trying to distract the public from the Lewinsky scandal.

You can't have it both ways. You can't criticize him for not doing more, when he got royally criticized by the Republicans at the time when he did bomb his training camps in Afghanistan.
Click to expand...

I see, he failed to get the terrorists because he was busy being condemned and he had to relent. What an absolute pillar of leadership.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top