jjay2518
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2007
- Messages
- 9,665
- Likes
- 2,447
It's a mystery to me that Vol fans hate Memphis worse than Vandy,I pull for the SEC when TN is not playing. It's hard for me to pull for KY or FLA or etc.. when they are playing someone else because they are our rival. Memphis is in our state just like TN State or MIDDLE TN, but not in the SEC. Why do yall hate MEM so bad?
Academics in general. People around here think it's much better than it actually is. I guess that could be true for the area around every school, but it's definitely something I've noticed.
It is generally ranked somewhere in the mid-teens--behind the Ivy Leagues and the best of the privates, ahead of the best of the state schools and among the top of the rest of the privates.
Seems about right to me.
2 championship games in 36 years does not a dynasty make. Besides, UT has the same number of BB NC's as Memphis (0)
Congratulations, I did not realize that the NCAA has started giving out participation trophies. How does that work, the further you advance the bigger the trophy?
.
Actually the NCAA does give out trophies to the Regional Champions. Seeing Villanova's on TV just reminded me of the 3 the Tigers have in the case.
Based on some pretty extensive experience with graduates of both schools, I certainly don't have a problem with that.
The founders of Apple, Intel and even Myspace, as well as 62 Nobel laureates, a former Chief Justice and the inventor of the computer mouse that you may or may not be using all disagree with you. And I promise that if you leave the South, pretty much everyone else will too.
The folks that keep ranking them won't. It doesn't really matter, anyway; your assertion that Vanderbilt is overrated academically is just plain wrong. It is rated just where it should be, in the handful of schools below the Ivies and their equivalent and above pretty much everything else. Add Cal in that group if you like, but it doesn't change anything.
Oh, and Vandy has a pretty distinguished list of notable alumni as well. After all, the guy who invented the internet is a Vandy man.
The folks that keep ranking them won't. It doesn't really matter, anyway; your assertion that Vanderbilt is overrated academically is just plain wrong. It is rated just where it should be, in the handful of schools below the Ivies and their equivalent and above pretty much everything else. Add Cal in that group if you like, but it doesn't change anything.
Oh, and Vandy has a pretty distinguished list of notable alumni as well. After all, the guy who invented the internet is a Vandy man.
Washington has no business on that list.Depends what you mean by "handful"...if you mean like 20 schools sure, but it is not on a level with Duke, Northwestern, Berkeley, Michigan, Wash U, UCLA, Johns Hopkins, etc.
I knew the Al Gore thing was coming. Haha. But he didn't even finish there.
Washington has no business on that list.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Depends what you mean by "handful"...if you mean like 20 schools sure, but it is not on a level with Duke, Northwestern, Berkeley, Michigan, Wash U, UCLA, Johns Hopkins, etc.
I knew the Al Gore thing was coming. Haha. But he didn't even finish there.
I would suggest that Vanderbilt belongs exactly on the level with Cal, Northwestern, UCLA, Johns Hopkins, and Washington (I'm assuming you mean the Washington in St. Louis.) I would put it slightly below Duke if only because I know so many Vandy students from the east coast whose first choice was Duke. It is above Michigan, primarily because, as a state school, UM has different selectivity and educational mandates.
I have a bit of experience in the way such things work. I know which schools Vandy competes against for incoming students and how those competitions tend to shake out. I know which schools' graduates compete against Vandy graduates for jobs and graduate school admissions, and I know how those competitions seem to shake out. Both of those factors seem to validate Vandy's rankings.
As all of the information I have seems to say the rankings are pretty good, what is it that makes you believe they are wrong?
That's just it. I don't think they are wrong. I think that the two that I just linked, along with US News, are the three most respected rankings out there. Most people here look at US News first and use that as their basis. It has Vandy 18th. However, the other two have Vandy in the 30s in America. On average, Vandy is in the upper 20s. I don't think that's wrong. I just think most people spend so much time on US News that they don't realize it.
Nobody says much about this do they,I love the VOLS.