omghulkhands
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2010
- Messages
- 12,116
- Likes
- 14,427
Not calling the TO is the much smarter play than thinking you get a shot out of set play from a timeout. It's far easier to stop an offensive set out of a timeout. There's so many things you can do from a defensive standpoint to disrupt the offense in a short period of time.
If you don't believe me, watch some basketball. Let me know how many times an offense wins the game after a timeout. Then, watch how many times the last minute winner is won on a play in the flow of the game. One will be significantly higher than the other.
Not calling the TO is the much smarter play than thinking you get a shot out of set play from a timeout. It's far easier to stop an offensive set out of a timeout. There's so many things you can do from a defensive standpoint to disrupt the offense in a short period of time.
If you don't believe me, watch some basketball. Let me know how many times an offense wins the game after a timeout. Then, watch how many times the last minute winner is won on a play in the flow of the game. One will be significantly higher than the other.
Agreed, but you may want somebody to bring it down the court who doesn't turn it over or make a boneheaded play in the clutch every timeNot calling the TO is the much smarter play than thinking you get a shot out of set play from a timeout. It's far easier to stop an offensive set out of a timeout. There's so many things you can do from a defensive standpoint to disrupt the offense in a short period of time.
If you don't believe me, watch some basketball. Let me know how many times an offense wins the game after a timeout. Then, watch how many times the last minute winner is won on a play in the flow of the game. One will be significantly higher than the other.
NO if we ran that maymon play we did on memphis that would have been a better shot and look then Golden running up the court and turning the ball over.
Or, the Maymon play in the 1st OT that resulted in a TO, or the same in the 2nd OT. Timeouts rarely work and most coaches worth their salt won't call them in that situation unless they see the play not developing to their liking.
Ask Bob Knight, he had the same philosophy.
What one? The Maymon bucket? Yeah, it works every once in a while, but, take note of how many times a basket is scored late off a timeout. It's much less often than times teams score without calling timeout.
Your hero never called timeouts in those situations, and we spent all last year chucking halfcourt shots at the end of ball games. I must have missed where you were *****ing about it then.
What was it Einstein said described someone who does
the same thing over and over again and keeps expecting
different results.
You mean the one other close game we played is an example of "over and over"?
People need to chill. It's December and we've played some tough games and are learning how to play in a new system. We won't play Duke and Pitt every game, so wins will come. And, we certainly shouldn't pitch a fit that Martin hasn't produced a top 20 team within three weeks.
You realize that guy who "turns it over in crunch time" had just hit a big 3 to bring us within a bucket, right? And, who else is going to bring the ball up the court? McRae? Tatum? Maymon?