VolsSportsFan
FUDJT
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 74,292
- Likes
- 47,789
Why not support the team, not showing up is not the way to send a msg regarding the coach.
All it does is makes us look bad as a fan base. Not attending games we will screw ourselves.
Not supporting the team sends the wrong statement. The players have made great sacrifices of time, blood, and sweat for the university and the fans not to turn out in support of them is wrong.
The AD or the University may or may not have supported the players by not properly evaluated the coach and staff, but the jury is still out on this and we will not know anything until the end of the season.
Not supporting this team by attendance is High School crap and I am glad to see that not all students or the majority of the fan base is not buying into this tactic.
You want to change something then email, write, or call every prominent donor, AD, President in a group with the same unified msg until you are blue in the face.
I agree that would be the ideal way to foster change but in this world that will be about as effective as the petition. The only thing the power brokers at UT look at are the numbers at the bottom of the spreadsheet. The only criteria that is looked at is how keeping him vs firing him impacts the bottom line. He could go 4-26 and they'd keep him if the attendance was strong. I'm not advocating staying away, but stating my opinion of what moves the decision makers.
The thing that gets me is you say that staying away will help the most, but people (not necessarily saying you, cause I don't feel like digging) come on here completely trashing the coach and many times the players. What's the point of all that if just simply not showing up is all it takes?
I agree that would be the ideal way to foster change but in this world that will be about as effective as the petition. The only thing the power brokers at UT look at are the numbers at the bottom of the spreadsheet. The only criteria that is looked at is how keeping him vs firing him impacts the bottom line. He could go 4-26 and they'd keep him if the attendance was strong. I'm not advocating staying away, but stating my opinion of what moves the decision makers.
While I've expressed my displeasure with Coach Cuonzo I've never trashed a player. The coaches are paid where the players are not. I don't think Cuonzo is the long term solution for our Vols. I think if he survives this year he'll be here a maximum of two more years. That's all conjecture and I'm sure others have a difference of opinion.
As to discussions here, it has no bearing on what happens over on the hill. Volnation is a place to discuss the good and the bad, hopefully respectfully. It gives fans a place to celebrate the good things and complain about the bad things. One things for sure we all can agree on..... we want the Vols to succeed at the highest of levels. We just have differences of opinions on the best routes to get us there.
Second point. They made the NCAAT but they didn't deserve it. I think they made it because Tobias was on the team and it was media related. Their record did not deserve it and Cuonzo has done better than that his first, second and soon to be third year. 9-9 in the SEC??? 8-8 to finish the year??? Even when your boy had 31 wins and won the SEC outright he didn't win the SECT. I know there's a jinx on but if he cant do it with 31 wins I want someone else who can. ******n GA won the SECT the year we had 31 freakin wins.