Coach Jumper
"the right words"
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2016
- Messages
- 15,891
- Likes
- 26,564
The lack of pure shooters is one that I think can be corrected and will be if the emphasis has been put on improving there.
Shooters have to have "green light, under scrutiny" environment...Meaning they have to know they are given permission to take the shot, without ramifications or being called out, if it WAS a good decision. But they have to fall under a tighter scrutiny if it is a bad decision.
There are drills for developing your team's shooting. I can take my drill, "Bang Bang" and make ANY team a better shooting team. It is the shooters mental environment that needs to be addressed. If there is even an inkling of doubt, the shooter tenses up and that effects even the highest caliber player.
Our biggest issue has been Holly's belief that getting it into the post by any means necessary is the solution to victory.
Thank God this won't be a problem this year.
This would also help us beating the 2-3 we have to have someone to be able to step at the free throw line/high post and his that shot with consistency (they also must be willing to take that shot and not be told to look into the post when that shot is wide open).
A high-post (elbow) Point-Forward would cut a zone to pieces,. They would have to concentrate on the high post player and she could work the paint with movement, catch the entry-draw the defense and hit a mid-paint cutter, or backdoor, or shooter or she could shoot the elbow/or/drive strongside. It doesn't fall completely on the shot to break the zone.
Yes 3pt shooters are a necessity and a weapon. But then again, so is a "time out"
The defensive intensity in the Post starts with your Post player and for the Past 4 seasons we had one (and I am not knocking her) that was more concerned with controlling how many fouls she got instead of focusing on how many shots she could send in the stands (Block shots). When there is an anchor in the middle teams are less likely to come into the Paint.
With KK and CG we get smaller but tons more intimidating on would be drivers.
I am intrigued to see how the team plays without the feeling of entitlement or knowing that no one else will take their spot. We finally have a roster imo where every spot is up for grabs (or at least should be) and if you're slipping you could easily sit on the bench.
Competition is always better but when there is no competition you become complacent.
X 1,000....With a team like this one coming in, you have a whole team of could-be starters.
I'm willing to give Holly until the 2017 class (Rennia, Evina, KK, Annie) are seniors and if they haven't accomplished a Final Four then and the program looks like it is still stuck when it is then I will get back on board with a possible replacement.
I am atleast willing to give her that chance as I feel that class (2017) imo is truly her 1st recruiting class
No way. Last year she was given a perfect storm. (No off-season drama, great roster, top recruiting class, the entire staff was of her choosing and orchestration. And we went into a tail spin at our first loss....Time for CHW to catch up.
This year,
no off-season drama,
Strong roster full of quality returners,
new crop of McD AA's,
no change in staff....
This is two back to back years of perfect storm starts.
If we under-achieve this year, then there is only one constant left!
Last edited: