With pig more than likely returning, how good is our wr core

#36
#36
Dudleys87 said:
Get yo popcorn ready
Click to expand...

Hkq3c.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#38
#38
The exciting thing about our WR core is that it should be together a few years, potentially with the same quarterback if one of the young guys starts. Consistency and talent? That sounds like winning football.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#39
#39
oregonvol said:
Have we forgotten that Worley had two years prior with NFL-caliber receivers and posted pretty much the same dismal numbers whenever he played?
Click to expand...

2 years?

How many minutes did Worley play in 2012? Maybe 10?
 
Last edited:
#41
#41
dyllisvol42 said:
With pig more than likely coming back, and kameel Jackson coming in as a walk on, I know that besides North and pig they haven't even played a down yet but just on ability alone is this the best wr core ut has ever had? I'm asking some of our older volnation members.
Click to expand...

From this particular vantage point compared to other groups from the same vantage point, this looks like the best group UT has ever had and one of the best the SEC has ever seen. Now they just have to go out and play winning football.
 
#42
#42
VolAllen said:
Well one thing is certain...Josh Smith will never play.
Click to expand...

I think he'll play plenty. Probably fair to say he'll never start again barring injury this year. When we bring in P. Williams and another stud or 2 for '15 you may be right IMHO.
 
#43
#43
Carl Pickens, Alvin Harper, Anthony Morgan, Greg Amsler (outta the backfield obviously) and Thomas Woods made up the '89 team. Can't imagine this year's class will top that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#44
#44
oregonvol said:
Have we forgotten that Worley had two years prior with NFL-caliber receivers and posted pretty much the same dismal numbers whenever he played?
Click to expand...

Worley played behind a pretty porous line as a Fr after his RS was burned. He faced two top 10 teams in his 3 weeks as a starter with no relevant running game. He had ONE NFL caliber WR still playing at that point of the season- DR. Seems like that's about the time DD moved Neal to WR out of desperation.

His most significant PT of '12 was against Vandy. He went 8 of 11 for 51 yds after Bray went 11 for 29 for 101.

You've badly overstated your criticism on this one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#45
#45
They're good, but are they the best? I'm sure we'll know in a year or two. I think the 95-98 receiving corp were pretty good.
 
#46
#46
sjt18 said:
Worley played behind a pretty porous line as a Fr after his RS was burned. He faced two top 10 teams in his 3 weeks as a starter with no relevant running game. He had ONE NFL caliber WR still playing at that point of the season- DR. Seems like that's about the time DD moved Neal to WR out of desperation.

His most significant PT of '12 was against Vandy. He went 8 of 11 for 51 yds after Bray went 11 for 29 for 101.

You've badly overstated your criticism on this one.
Click to expand...

have to agree with this, he is just throwing sh!t against the wall to see what sticks.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top