Carl Pickens
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2006
- Messages
- 45,506
- Likes
- 62,474
I would be. No one should forced to be guilty by association just based on their skin color.I guess to me this is still being mad over nothing for the most part. If Black female tennis players were on a pedestal for years and then Serena came along, took the popularity to soaring new heights and then acknowledged her Black privilege (even with a “but”), I would not be upset by that at all
No one said anything about guilt or a second class. “I did well [and/but] benefited from white privilege” is the same message IMO. If “and” makes it a completely different message to you then it seems like the “and” and reference to white privilege was disingenuous/fake in the first placeI would be. No one should forced to be guilty by association just based on their skin color.
I am not upset. I just see a fundamental flaw with the woke argument. the "fix" is to create a second class citizen out of white members who have to apologize for their race or go out of their way to avoid being able to just accept individual accolades without being expected to turn it into some type of message for change.
in short "yes, and" rather than "yes, but" is a strong difference in messaging.
so "and" and "but" mean the same thing to you?No one said anything about guilt or a second class. “I did well [and/but] benefited from white privilege” is the same message IMO. If “and” makes it a completely different message to you then it seems like the “and” and reference to white privilege was disingenuous/fake in the first place
"Inclusive" meaning that you are including white privilege as a reason for your popularity along with your own play. "Contradictory" meaning that your play is one reason for your popularity, but also white privilege is another reason for your popularity. Those are the same thingso "and" and "but" mean the same thing to you?
never went to any leadership or speech classes that taught the differences in messaging and how word choice matters to the message you are trying to get across?
In pretty much every single thing I have read/heard/learned its not what you say that really matters to how people pick up on it. Its how you say that matters the most to people's reaction of something. very similar to the "its not what you know, its who you know that matters" idiom.
"and" is inclusive. "but" is contradictory. I don't see how you can see them as the same.
except that she didn't say that. she just said that being a white PERSON comes with privileges. didn't mention herself as a player there, or mention her popularity, or how being a white PERSON lead to that recognition."Inclusive" meaning that you are including white privilege as a reason for your popularity along with your own play. "Contradictory" meaning that your play is one reason for your popularity, but also white privilege is another reason for your popularity. Those are the same thing
Another distinction without a difference. This is clearly about playing basketball and the stardom associated with that.except that she didn't say that. she just said that being a white PERSON comes with privileges. didn't mention herself as a player there, or mention her popularity, or how being a white PERSON lead to that recognition.
she inserted a completely different train of thought, white privilege. which is why I said it was CONTRADICTORY use of "but".
your argument relies on completely changing the meaning of the words she actually uses while also inserting a whole bunch of subtext that isn't actually there.
Clark is cognizant of the racial underpinnings of her stardom. “I want to say I’ve earned every single thing, but as a white person, there is privilege,” says Clark. “A lot of those players in the league that have been really good have been Black players. This league has kind of been built on them.
She's acknowledging that she has a built-in advantage over Black players when it comes to popularity. Again, a fact. And now we've talked in a circle and people are still upset over nothing and arguing semanticsso tell me what her popularity and hard work has to do with there being good black players? you know, since I am making a distinction with no difference.
Caitlin Clark definitely gets some of her fan following because of her whiteness, just like, but to a far lesser extent, Yao Ming did because of his nationality.
But...let's say CC is a 7 on the athlete scale, if a black girl who is a 7 were doing Steph Curry ****, she would be the most popular player, too. Maybe not quite as big as CC, but I believe those two factors are much more responsible for her popularity than the color of her skin.
yep - CC is a phenom. I'll add it may not be white privilege but simply being a different skin tone than almost everyone else in the sport. I black hockey player who is a phenom would be crazy popular and in part because he's unique.
the concept of privilege is much deeper