Wolves are NOT endangered.

#51
#51
I can live with climate change............ my biggest problem is the gloom and doom and no acknowledgement that the Earth's climate is cyclical.
 
#52
#52
Ya, it sounds like he is speaking of normal climate change, is not decided on whether it is anthropogenic or not.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#53
#53
KB5252 said:
OK, the words are used and interchanged so often it's not really clear what some people mean by them unless they explain their position in detail. It is clear that you fall into the undecided camp.
Click to expand...

Well, not totally undecided. To think there is no fault of mankind would be foolish. I certainly believe man has played a role in it. I am not certain the extent of it. I am certain Polar Bears are endangered. It's a proven fact
 
#55
#55
OrangeEmpire said:
I can live with climate change............ my biggest problem is the gloom and doom and no acknowledgement that the Earth's climate is cyclical.
Click to expand...

Captain Obvious has never made any money or won Nobel prizes
 
#56
#56
truefan said:
Well, not totally undecided. To think there is no fault of mankind would be foolish. I certainly believe man has played a role in it. I am not certain the extent of it. I am certain Polar Bears are endangered. It's a proven fact
Click to expand...

Dear administrator........ assign a %.......

What does you gut tell you?

.0001%
 
#57
#57
OrangeEmpire said:
I can live with climate change............ my biggest problem is the gloom and doom and no acknowledgement that the Earth's climate is cyclical.
Click to expand...

The total doom and gloom is understandably objectionable (as far as extreme pessimism), but the "no
acknowledgement of Earth's climate is cyclical" is more a product of skeptics than anything based in reality. There would be no gcc theory without the study and knowledge of earth's dynamic climate historically.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#59
#59
IPorange said:
The total doom and gloom is understandably objectionable (as far as extreme pessimism), but the "no
acknowledgement of Earth's climate is cyclical" is more a product of skeptics than anything based in reality. There would be no gcc theory without the study and knowledge of earth's dynamic climate historically.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

How far does this history go back?

Like I said, kill the head of the snake, as soon as I get my time machine running, I'll kill Pavlov. :)
 
#62
#62
Ok, I had a breather.......

The millions of years thing really baffles me......... no reasonable doubt any where.... all is fact?
 
#64
#64
OrangeEmpire said:
Ok, I had a breather.......

The millions of years thing really baffles me......... no reasonable doubt any where.... all is fact?
Click to expand...

Reasonable doubt is a relative concept. And the climate record does not provide anything but context. I was pointing out that it is used, not ignored by scientists.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#67
#67
truefan said:
I see you still have no idea anything about me. Why would you automatically think this? yes, because you are really ignorant. That is the truth of the matter. I am not sold on GW but am certain on climate change. As a know-nothing deluxe you can pop it off as though you know, but I will always know better. No go back to being stupid. YOu're really good at it.
Click to expand...

since you linked to a site in which the primary claim for the supposed endangerment of polar bears was due to global warming, anthropogenic global warming in particular, causing a decline in sea ice.

I'm pretty certain on climate change as well, but it's not the cause of the polar bear's decline either. The species has been around for at least 100 thousand years, which is more than enough time to have endured some pretty significant climactic changes in their environment.
 
#68
#68
truefan said:
Climate change is real. There is no debate as to the event. The debate is in the cause, such as global warming.
Click to expand...

The climate of this planet has always been in a state of flux (change) and always will be, there is no political move that can be made that will change that factoid.

Another factoid is that there have been times in Earth history that were much warmer than today (with very much higher leves of CO2 btw) that were much more advantageous for most all life forms on this planet, particularly plant life and more plant life is a benefit to animal life also.



IPorange said:
Ya, it sounds like he is speaking of normal climate change, is not decided on whether it is anthropogenic or not.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

NOT!!

While it is true that mankind and his activity is part of the equation, he isn't the plague upon the planet that the socialists who are drooling for more power and control would have you believe.

Consider the words of Obama's 'science czar'.

Is that the kind of nazi like future you would care to envision???



truefan said:
Well, not totally undecided. To think there is no fault of mankind would be foolish. I certainly believe man has played a role in it. I am not certain the extent of it. I am certain Polar Bears are endangered. It's a proven fact
Click to expand...

You are certainly wrong about polar bears being endangered, they aren't even on the endangered species list.

Wolves are however on the list and anyone with even half a workable brain sees they need to be removed and are only on the list for political reasons.





KB5252 said:
I assume we are talking ice cores?
Click to expand...

No I think we are talking about ice cubes.

Or maybe a Vulcan mind meld.

Speaking of melding, did you ever stop to think that ice bergs are just ice cubes, only bigger??



IPorange said:
And geologic indicators, such as the growing field of looking at various signature lithic isotopes.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Click to expand...

That nails it you have completely convinced me.

Wolves whould be removed from the endangered species list.
 
#71
#71
IPorange said:
Oh, gsvol. You're so crazy! You should have your own blog.
Click to expand...

An ice blog???

Should I have my own polar bear too??

Speaking of ICE;



























ad18w4.jpg
 
#73
#73
Regarding the first link, I think the obvious answer is insect repellent with that fresh gun oil smell.
 
#74
#74
vader said:
Regarding the first link, I think the obvious answer is insect repellent with that fresh gun oil smell.
Click to expand...

3 in one rocks!!! :) (don't get caught though, I think it's a felony to shoot at a wolf.)

Thanks, some other questions:

Who is the monitor who puts all my thread starters into the gsvol compendium thread every weekend??

If you can say ass but you can't say sh!t, is that being anal retentive??

Do you think wolves should be removed from the endangered species list?

If during WWII we captured a German submarine designated U-234 and discovered that it contained 3/4 of a ton of uranium, do you think if we captured a uboat with enriched uranium, would it have been designated U-235??

Do VWs float better than GM products??

Why doesn't everyone drive a car like me that doesn't emit CO2 since my car is powered by radioactive geraniums??

If the econazis in the EPA had gotten their way and taxed farmers for flatulent bovines to the tune of $60 per head per year for beef cattle and $80 per head per year for dairy cattle, would God have had to pay the tax for wolf, elk and 'possum farts??

Being serious for a moment, I think Al Sharpton got that EPA iniative killed because it was discriminatory against Jesse Jackson.

If the fart tax had gotten off the ground what about old farts like me who like to eat a big bait of beans and then go over to the courthouse and play checkers all day, you can imagine what the mayor thinks about that.

So many questions, so few answers, so little time.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top