I don't think we "deserved" a 5 with our rpi. I think we were 3/4 material.(Vol423 @ Mar 12 said:That is honestly the most ridiculous seed that I've ever seen the selection committee produce. I could see UT getting a #4 seed, but honestly, they deserved a #5 seed. A #2 seed is totally inexplicable.
(vol_freak @ Mar 12 said:I don't think we "deserved" a 5 with our rpi. I think we were 3/4 material.
Are you a bama fan or something. Saying we deserve a 5 and now we will lose to Winthrop?(Vol423 @ Mar 12 said:You heard it here first, folks. UT goes down in Round #1 to Winthrop. Winthrop has a lot of NCAA tournament experience over the last few years.
Allright, that clears up my question. So who is your team?(Vol423 @ Mar 12 said:As I said before, I would have no real issue with a #4 seed. #3 seeds, however, don't drop 4 of their last 6 games. UT didn't deserve a #3 seed, and the only logical explanation for the Vols getting a #2 seed is the selection committee hitting the crack pipe.
If UT can survive to get to the Sweet 16, though, Roy and the boys will be more than happy to boot the Vols back to Knoxville.
(Vol423 @ Mar 12 said:As I said before, I would have no real issue with a #4 seed. #3 seeds, however, don't drop 4 of their last 6 games. UT didn't deserve a #3 seed, and the only logical explanation for the Vols getting a #2 seed is the selection committee hitting the crack pipe.
If UT can survive to get to the Sweet 16, though, Roy and the boys will be more than happy to boot the Vols back to Knoxville.
(Vol423 @ Mar 12 said:You heard it here first, folks. UT goes down in Round #1 to Winthrop. Winthrop has a lot of NCAA tournament experience over the last few years.