VolFan4Life87
Negatron
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2012
- Messages
- 5,897
- Likes
- 4,116
Agreed on Dooley. I think Dooley did far more damage to UT than Kiffin, and I think Dooley inherited a better team than Jones did. Many thought Dooley had at least "filled the cupboard" for Jones; laid the foundation. I think this season illustrates just how far from the truth that really is.
Dooley was bad, but nowhere near #1 out of this group. Ron Zook, John Blake, Mike DuBose, Charlie Weis, Dan Hawkins, Ty Willingham, and Paul Hackett were all worse. Many of those guys inherited great situations and managed to turn things south very quickly.
On paper, Ron Zook's win-lose record is better than Dooley's, but consider how much talent Ron Zook had! He easily had amongst the top 3 most talented squads in all of college football and still managed to go 8-5, 8-5, and 7-5 in his three years. The SEC was also significantly easier back then than it has been the past several years.
Urban Meyer followed Zook and went 9-3 in Year 1 and 13-1 in Year 2, mostly with Ron Zook's recruits. It wasn't a huge surprise, because everyone knew Meyer was sitting on a goldmine that Zook could never use properly.
If Dooley had coached Zook's Florida teams, I think he would've been 8-4 or 9-3 at least. Maybe even 10-2. It's hard not to win with all that talent. It's likely that Dooley would've been good (but not great) for 2-3 more years, and then would've slowly deteriorated. But Zook was so terrible, he managed to take some of the greatest talent assembled in college football and would still lose 5 games every season.
Dooley was a poor coach, but let's be honest: he inherited a bad situation. His biggest sin was not turning it around, and in fact, making it slightly worse.
In hindsight, it was surely awful. But it's hard for me to look at that as the classic bad hire. It's crazy when you think about all the things that had to happen to create the situation where we got screwed. I think Kiffin is a complete jackass, but I don't think even he could've envisioned a scenario where Pete Carroll would sneak out the back door at USC and the job would fall into his lap after just 1 year at Tennessee.
I could see both sides of that, honestly. When you look at the way it ended and the damage just one year did, that hire could be on the list.
However, if you look at the hire at the time and the staff he assembled, along with what was going on with recruiting, one could argue it wasn't a disaster of a hire. Of course, we will never know what could have been. Kiffin had some things going for him when that hire was made. He didn't win in Oakland, but most of us chalked that up to Al Davis. Kiffin didn't want JaMarcus Russel, after all. He had been a key part of a college football powerhouse, so in ways, the hire made sense. I wasn't in love with the hire, but I wouldn't put it in the Dooley category either. It all depends on criteria I guess. Even Dubose and Shula had a moment of success at Bama and they made the list.
or USC.
How did I guess who would be #1 without looking first?
i think if they do another similar list in a few years you might see will muschump on it. i know his record was good the first couple of years but they were the worst 10 win you ever see. And the literally had recruiting classes similar to bama the last 4 or years. Of course this year they've just been totally exposed