Pretty good interview with the Hitman:
Bret Hart discusses Triple H, bad booking, and the Survivor Series - Extra Mustard - SI.com
I agree and disagree with him on some things.
-I don't agree that it's HHH that likes the big guys. This has always been Vince's thing. It's quite the opposite. HHH backs guys like Kevin Owens, but Vince drools over the guys like Reigns. I think Bret's grudge against HHH is affecting his opinion.
-Obviously I don't agree with him about Reigns being one of the hardest workers. As Austin said, the guy basically took a nap in the corner during the Royal Rumble. I think this is another case of his personal bias affecting is opinion, since Reigns is a big fan of Bret. Don't necessarily agree with him about Ambrose either, altho admittedly I never considered the aspect of guys going for one spot after another instead of selling the impact. Maybe Ambrose is good at that; I haven't paid attention. There is a lot of spot monkey stuff that goes on now, particularly in the indies and NXT. Guys don't sell the psychology of the match. The women in NXT are actually doing a good job it.
-I definitely agree with him on Rollins being on the unsafe side. I like Rollins, but even before Cena and Sting were hurt, Rollins has looked reckless.
-I disagree that Reigns as been the victim of bad booking. He's had favorable booking. He's been the victim of bad creative. Some moron in the back (and by moron, I mean the old geezer) thinks because he is related to the Rock that he can come out and spin nursery rhymes like the Rock. He's better off being the quiet Diesel type.
-Not sure if I agree that Heyman is the best manager in the history of wrestling. It would have to be a tie between him and Heenan methinks.
-Agree they don't book their European stars well, but Sheamus is flat out boring. Barrett is misused badly (even if he still looks like he needs to eat a sammich), as was McIntyre. Cesaro speaks 17 languages. 17! If that is not an ambassador for your company, then I don't know what is.