Boston Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2008
- Messages
- 16,102
- Likes
- 31,008
If Fulmer is average then UT is below average. Your argument is weak.
My argument is weak? Nope here it is. Fulmer was successful when he surrounded himself with high quality assistant coaches who could bring in top flight talent. He also benefited from a weaker SEC. When those assistants started to leave, so did the talent. The level of competition in the conference greatly improved and he was exposed as the average coach that he had always been. That's all.