Zimmerman Trial

#3,752
#3,752
DinkinFlicka said:
1) whether or not TM was making lean is irrelevant.

2) I wonder if the skittles were opened or closed.
Click to expand...

It is not irrelevant as the skittles and iced tea were used by the prosecution to paint him as a harmless child who only wanted to eat candy and drink tea.

So it's not irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,754
#3,754
utvolpj said:
what a confusing interview

George Zimmerman Juror Says He 'Got Away With Murder' - ABC News


so you "know" he was guilty but there is no evidence of it and it shouldn't have even gone to trial?

and come on ABC, this crap is getting old
Click to expand...



Someone needs to inform this (In the words of Al Sharptounge) ignant person that GZ didn’t get away with anything... you DECIDED he was not guilty of the charges.

She has 8 kids you and I are supporting
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,755
#3,755
volmaverick said:
Someone needs to inform this (In the words of Al Sharptounge) ignant person that GZ didn’t get away with anything... you DECIDED he was not guilty of the charges.

She has 8 kids you and I are supporting
Click to expand...

All six of the jurors were women and Maddy, 36, who is Puerto Rican, was the only minority to deliberate in the racially charged case. Zimmerman, 29, was a white Hispanic and Martin, 17, was black.
Click to expand...

Racially charged? The media turned this into a racially charged case. Race had nothing to do with it except in the minds of the government-media complex.
 
#3,759
#3,759
Juror 29..George Zimmerman is guilty of murder !

She says that on TV

He should sue this IDIOT for all her food stamps

Mom of 8 by how many diff fathers???

What a slut
 
#3,760
#3,760
volmaverick said:
Juror 29..George Zimmerman is guilty of murder !

She says that on TV

He should sue this IDIOT for all her food stamps

Mom of 8 by how many diff fathers???

What a slut
Click to expand...

Why would he sue? Can she not give her opinion?

What does promiscuity have to do with anything?

Let it go dude. You are so angry.
 
#3,761
#3,761
JUROR 29 “got away with murder” for fatally shooting Trayvon Martin, but that there wasn’t enough evidence at trial to convict him under Florida law.”

Someone in the state of Fla. ought to explain to these people that evidence (or in SOME cases, the lack of it), is the reason a we have a judge and jury who meet to determine innocence or guilt of the accused...instead of following the ‘judgement’ of public opinion.

Public opinion whicn is at best flawed, fallable, emotional, subjective (and THANKS TO THE MSM- both misinformed and uninformed)- I say that Public Opinion...CANNOT be relied upon to properly and objectively assess facts or evidence!!!

You don’t have to be a genius to comprehend this.
 
#3,763
#3,763
volmaverick said:
JUROR 29 “got away with murder” for fatally shooting Trayvon Martin, but that there wasn’t enough evidence at trial to convict him under Florida law.”

Someone in the state of Fla. ought to explain to these people that evidence (or in SOME cases, the lack of it), is the reason a we have a judge and jury who meet to determine innocence or guilt of the accused...instead of following the ‘judgement’ of public opinion.

Public opinion whicn is at best flawed, fallable, emotional, subjective (and THANKS TO THE MSM- both misinformed and uninformed)- I say that Public Opinion...CANNOT be relied upon to properly and objectively assess facts or evidence!!!

You don’t have to be a genius to comprehend this.
Click to expand...

It doesn't matter. She did her duty she can say what she wants.
 
#3,766
#3,766
volmaverick said:
Let it go???

LOL

They are the ones still screaming on TV
Click to expand...

You should respect that she didn't let her emotion and prejudices effect her vote in the jury room. She followed the law and rendered the correct decision.

Respect it! The legal system worked to a degree.
 
#3,769
#3,769
Vols520 said:
Wouldn't really care. I assume people would think you were crazy.

And also she is tech correct. It was a legal murder though.
Click to expand...

It was a legal murder

Find out what the diff is between murder and killing

there is a world of difference between killing and murder!


Did the soilders in WWII murder or kill?
 
Last edited:
#3,771
#3,771
I find it very strange that opinions about this case divide so strongly. The law and facts of the case remain the same, yet two sides view them very differently. Stranger still is that the two sides appear to be determined by race, sexual orientation, and politics. Those three factors absolutely should not decide peoples' perceptions of a jury trial, but they do.

Both Zimmerman and Martin made mistakes on that night, but only one crossed the line into a violent violation of the law. To me, it is clear which person did that, and I do not believe that my race, sexual orientation, or politics determines my conclusion.
 
#3,772
#3,772
Juror B29 is now just cowardly pandering to the race baiters, hoping to avoid death threats by the great unwashed stupid masses, especially the 98% of the black community who are calling for GZ's head.

The press could have calmed the story down from the start, "Man shoots while suspected prowler is beating him." Now that the press has invested so heavily in a false narrative, it isn't about to reverse course.
 
#3,774
#3,774
volmaverick said:
Juror B29 is now just cowardly pandering to the race baiters, hoping to avoid death threats by the great unwashed stupid masses, especially the 98% of the black community who are calling for GZ's head.

The press could have calmed the story down from the start, "Man shoots while suspected prowler is beating him." Now that the press has invested so heavily in a false narrative, it isn't about to reverse course.
Click to expand...

And who are you to fault juror B29 for that?

Maybe some people don't want to live in fear.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top