PI is a joke. It criminalizes the act of leaving an establishment where it's legal to get intoxicated.Public intoxication is illegal, which is what happened. If you are drunk in your home, more power to you. Just keep yourself in home.
No, the act of getting drunk is not criminal
"Tennessee Volunteers defensive end Andrew Butcher was arrested by Knoxville Police after he was found allegedly intoxicated as he ran around Interstate 40 at about 1:45 a.m. Sunday, according to a report from GoVolsXtra.
The report stated that Butcher had told the arresting officer that he had been drinking beer. Here is an excerpt from the article:
Butcher, 18, who listed White Avenue as his address, was arrested Sunday. He was charged with public intoxication, underage possession of alcohol and violating a controlled access roadway.
Records state an officer responding to a complaint of someone exhibiting drunken behavior on I-40 found Butcher running around on 40 East near James White Parkway.
PI is a joke. It criminalizes the act of leaving an establishment where it's legal to get intoxicated.
Based on your last statement I guess you're also against restaurants and bars serving alcohol? You need to be consistent to save those innocents leaving the amusement park
Are you drunk right now? Because you make less sense the longer this debate goes on.
I don't read this to mean he was out in traffic dodging oncoming cars but maybe you do. While I agree the above doesn't provide clarity of exactly what he was doing, I do think it is just as easy to interpret it to mean he was running within the right of way of I-40 in the vicinity of James White Pkwy.
I still feel its a huge leap to assume he was running around in traffic mainly because the Darwin theory would kick in as its not likely a drunk human can dodge vehicles traveling at 70 mph. :good!:
If your only defense is that someone passed a law so therefore it must be bad then I'll hand my phone to my 4yo so you can continue the debate.
Whether it's a law is inconsequential to the question of it's a joke or not
I would say if my only defense was that there is a law against it, then I'm on pretty firm ground. You might as well hand the phone to your 4 year old, maybe they will have a better understanding of how a law would be important to an argument about breaking a law.
Breaking a law and the law itself being ridiculous are 2 completely separate ideas. You'd still be outgunned since he could probably understand that fact
Do you believe the people passing laws only act in the best interest of the people?